|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
VTL IT-85 integrated amplifier
Having evaluated any number of integrated amplifiers in the past year or so, I've repeatedly been impressed by the ways in which designers build versatility and sonic distinction into their single-box designs. In matching those that sounded and measured the best—such as the tubed E.A.R. V20 (October 1999) and the solid-state Magnum Dynalab MD 208 receiver (January 2001)—with appropriate speakers and source components, I was able to attain high-resolution musicality with a minimum of fuss. Crave high-end sound but require even less complexity? You could dispense with interconnects altogether by integrating a high-quality CD player into a remote-controlled receiver, as Linn has with the diminutive Classik that I reviewed last November. Enter Luke Manley, of Vacuum Tube Logic, with a clever, cost-effective, high-performance solution that's equivalent to a first-rate, remote-controlled, active line-level preamplifier—tubed, no less—with a fully functional power section thrown in for free. Do I gild the lily? In triplicate, but only to make a point: When auditioning the VTL IT-85, consumers need not feel unduly limited as they contemplate future upgrades. While the IT-85 integrated amp was designed to be a no-compromise, standalone unit, its buffered preamp output means that you can mate it to its standalone VTL sibling, the ST-85 stereo power amplifier that Lonnie Brownell reviewed for Stereophile in February 1999. The IT-85 and ST-85 were designed to form a balanced, coherent, gain-matched system with which you can horizontally biamp your speakers without any external crossovers: the ST-85 handles the low frequencies and the IT-85's power amp covers the high frequencies, even as the latter's preamp section functions as the overall system controller. Warm Luke Considerably reduced in scale and using but a single pair of Svetlana EL34s per channel, the IT-85 confers the sound signature of its beefier brethren for a fraction of the price: $2500 for the IT-85, and $1750 more should you invoke the biamping option by purchasing the matching ST-85. This combo generates significantly less heat than the mighty Wotans; nevertheless, VTL designer and honcho Luke Manley warms to the subject of his aural double-decker with no less enthusiasm: "The circuit topology on all of our amps—the input stage, phase splitter, and push-pull output stage—is the same throughout the whole range," Manley explains by way of illustrating the trickle of technology down to his newest product. "We just add more power supply and more tubes for more power. But it gives a family sound so when people upgrade their systems or go to higher power, they know what to expect." And while readily acknowledges that "it's a given that you get multiple sonic improvements with separates," Manley makes a compelling case for the efficacy of his first integrated design. "In our mind, the IT-85 was for people who wanted the performance of separates but who wanted only one box, and who didn't want to remember which one you turn on first and last and all that. Sure, in some of our top-of-the-line power amps we go so far as to employ two separate chassis to isolate the power supply from the output stage, for obvious reasons. And I'd say that running with a separate preamp would tend to produce a somewhat smoother sound, with better transparency and dynamics. However, there are some sonic advantages to an integrated design. For instance, no matter how transparent your buffer is, having no buffer is always better—much clearer and more transparent. However, when you're designing a standalone preamp and the amplifier is not known, you've got to put a buffer on there because you cannot assume that the guy is going to always use short interconnects and a tube amp with high input impedance. On the IT-85, because the amp is known and it's right there, we were able to use the gain stage of our VTL 2.5 preamp—the first two 12AU7 tubes in the front—and we didn't need the buffer. The IT-85's pre-out is cathode-follower-buffered, though, because we knew that sometimes it might be employed to drive a solid-state amplified subwoofer."
Article Continues: Page 2 »
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


The only wrinkle I can think of regarding the long-term value of such designs is whether or not you plan to eventually upgrade your system. Separates buyers who've already made a substantial investment in a preamp have the flexibility to substantially upgrade their power section should circumstances warrant it—say, if you're faced with the possibility of filling a much bigger room with sound, or stepping up from efficient, coherent two-way speakers to bigger, full-range, floorstanding designs that crave more current and driver control.