|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio J. Gordon Holt
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters CES 2010 RMAF 2009 SSI 2009 CES 2009 RMAF 2008 FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
Proceed PAV audio/video preamplifier:
Technology The PAV's decorrelation circuitry is rather unusual. Proceed claims to be the first manufacturer to perform decorrelation by subtly shifting the left and right surrounds randomly in time. Other manufacturers use a frequency or a phase shift, neither of which, argues Madrigal, sounds as natural. In fact, Madrigal is so convinced of this that they've used some 250 components to implement this time-based decorrelation (compared with the approximately 50 components in the basic Pro Logic circuitry). To improve RF performance, a four-layer circuit board is used for the control, video, and digital circuits. The video circuitry has a 20MHz bandwidth, input to output, with a 65MHz (at 75 ohms) bandwidth line-driver on each output. The video on-screen character generator is in-circuit only while characters are actually displayed, so it won't degrade video performance in normal operation. Most of the PAV's major operating functions are controlled by a replaceable ROM chip; for upgrades, the manufacturer simply burns and distributes a new one. A recent change—which I haven't yet incorporated as I write this review—includes a phantom center option, the lack of which was a conspicuous omission in the original design. The same change also offers the choice of blue or black screens when an inactive video input is selected, which is useful if you wish to listen to music in the dark. I did encounter a problem with an early sample of the PAV: On two occasions the on-screen menus refused to appear when commanded. A new remote control didn't alleviate the problem—it cured itself each time after a few days, for no apparent reason. This sample was from the prototype run; a later production sample exhibited no such anomaly. Film sound I find it hard to imagine any better realization of the Pro Logic concept than that in the Proceed PAV. It's smooth yet detailed, free of distracting artifacts, and quiet. In the world of high-end audio-only playback, these would be assumed minimum standards. In the world of Pro Logic Home Theater, they're important virtues. I did most of my video-sound listening to the PAV in its THX mode. When I first heard a home THX system a couple of years ago, I confess that I found the sound rather dull—lacking in spaciousness on top and somewhat overripe lower down. With the PAV in my room, driving any of the speaker combinations mentioned above, this was very definitely not the case. With the THX circuits engaged, the top end sounded almost sweet on the best soundtracks (particularly with the McIntosh front-channel loudspeakers), though appropriately gutsy and in-your-face when needed. Switching to straight Pro Logic did increase the sparkle and openness in the treble, but at the cost, on many films, of a less than sweet and silky sound. The blame for this appears to be in the recordings, not the PAV; this substantiates, for me at least, the validity of THX re-equalization for soundtracks.
Article Continues: Page 3 »
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



