Once again JA brings out the reality of a basically poor amplifier with a price tag of $10K!! A damping factor of 12 !!! That must be a loose wooly ill defined 1940' sounding turd. Come on, and of course teh subjective reviewer gives it his blessing how wonderful it sounds. How on earth can such a design be nuetral in reproduction? Freq resspone shows a very limited range this is 2007 lotsa amps are down to DC -500kHz..I know mine are. With slew rates of 800V/uS to make things sound ALIVE. The $10 K unit sounds like one over privced under performer. Subjective listening, must mean teh listener is not interested in natural nuetrral electronics, but a highly colred underwhelming BLOATED mush box. You gotta be kidding Damping factor of 12 !!! In 1950 they did better than that didn't they? And of course it's magical sounding to the subjective one, can't be to lifelike reproduction. Essssh. and it got raves, as usual. Once again JA brings out reality, it's a technical mess. I'm sure it works forever, well made. $10K !!! A 110W...it's also grosly under powered. High end is about hi fi reproduction, bringing back the original performance, not through this kind of stuff? Recently in this months TAS, one writer says, a basic aduio truism, there is no such thing as too much POWER.....Never too much, but so many times way too little. And this 110W pc amp needs a 20A ckt!!! Come on, what kind of poor inefficent design is it? 20A requirments for a home amp..with such table radio output, someone goofed on that design. 
Once again JA brings out the reality of a basically poor amplifier with a price tag of $10K!! A damping factor of 12 !!! That must be a loose wooly ill defined 1940' sounding turd. Come on, and of course teh subjective reviewer gives it his blessing how wonderful it sounds. How on earth can such a design be nuetral in reproduction? Freq resspone shows a very limited range this is 2007 lotsa amps are down to DC -500kHz..I know mine are. With slew rates of 800V/uS to make things sound ALIVE. The $10 K unit sounds like one over privced under performer. Subjective listening, must mean teh listener is not interested in natural nuetrral electronics, but a highly colred underwhelming BLOATED mush box. You gotta be kidding Damping factor of 12 !!! In 1950 they did better than that didn't they? And of course it's magical sounding to the subjective one, can't be to lifelike reproduction. Essssh. and it got raves, as usual. Once again JA brings out reality, it's a technical mess. I'm sure it works forever, well made. $10K !!! A 110W...it's also grosly under powered. High end is about hi fi reproduction, bringing back the original performance, not through this kind of stuff? Recently in this months TAS, one writer says, a basic aduio truism, there is no such thing as too much POWER.....Never too much, but so many times way too little. And this 110W pc amp needs a 20A ckt!!! Come on, what kind of poor inefficent design is it? 20A requirments for a home amp..with such table radio output, someone goofed on that design.
