How could Stereophile's equipment reviews be improved? The listed choices are for your convenience; use the "Comments" box to make other suggestions.

Stereophile Mon, 12/14/1998 - 08:19

poll

How could <I>Stereophile</I>'s equipment reviews be improved? The listed choices are for your convenience; use the "Comments" box to make other suggestions.

More budget gear: 0% (0 votes)
More mid-priced gear: 0% (0 votes)
More exotic gear: 0% (0 votes)
More photos of gear: 0% (0 votes)
More bench tests: 0% (0 votes)
More side-by-side comparisons: 0% (0 votes)
More three-way (or more) comparisons: 0% (0 votes)
More electronic and acoustic theory: 0% (0 votes)
More consideration of compatibility with associated gear: 0% (0 votes)
More emphasis on reliability: 0% (0 votes)
More emphasis on upgradability: 0% (0 votes)
Mention manufacturer's track record with similar products: 0% (0 votes)

Total votes: 0

A continuation of last week's question. Equipment reviews are <I>Stereophile</I>'s bread and butter. Do they strike a good balance between technical details and subjective impressions? Are the measurements, charts, and graphs useful to you?