Cyrus CDi-XR CD player Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

I measured the Cyrus CDi-XR using my Audio Precision SYS2722 system. This player doesn't have digital inputs, so I used test signals burned on a CD-R. As these signals are restricted to a word length of 16 bits, this affected my measurements of resolution and noisefloor.

I used the Pierre Verany Digital Test CD to check the CDi-XR's error correction. It played the tracks with gaps in the data spiral up to 0.5mm in length without stuttering, but there were audible glitches when the gap was 0.75mm and longer. The Compact Disc standard, the so-called Red Book, requires only that a player cope with gaps of up to 0.2mm, but the Cyrus's error correction is not as good as that of the best players or transports I have measured in recent years (footnote 1).

The CDi-XR's output impedance was a suitably low 47 ohms from 20Hz to 20kHz. A 1kHz signal at 0dBFS resulted in an output level of 2.4V, which is 0.4V/1.6dB higher than the CD Standard's recommended maximum level of 2V. The Cyrus's impulse response (fig.1) indicates that the output inverts absolute polarity and that its reconstruction filter is a conventional linear-phase type, with equal amounts of ringing before and after the single sample at 0dBFS that I created for this test.

422Cyrusfig1

Fig.1 Cyrus CDi-XR, impulse response (one sample at 0dBFS, 44.1kHz sampling, 4ms time window).

With white noise at –4dBFS (fig.2, red and magenta traces), the CDi-XR's response was flat in the audioband but rolled off sharply above 20kHz, reaching full stop-band suppression at the Nyquist frequency of 22.05kHz (green vertical line). An aliased image at 25kHz of a full-scale tone at 19.1kHz (blue and cyan traces) lies at just –101dB (0.0009%), but a higher-level image (–83dB) is present at 69.1kHz. The distortion harmonics of the 19.1kHz tone all lie below –100dB (0.001%), though a small rise in the noisefloor with this signal can be seen both in the audioband and between 45kHz and 55kHz.

422Cyrusfig2

Fig.2 Cyrus CDi-XR, wideband spectrum of white noise at –4dBFS (left channel red, right magenta) and 19.1kHz tone at 0dBFS (left blue, right cyan), with data sampled at 44.1kHz (20dB/vertical div.).

Channel separation (not shown) was good at 79dB in both directions from 20Hz to 20kHz. The low-frequency noisefloor was clean (fig.3), with power supply–related spuriae all lying close to –120dB. The random noise components in this graph are due to the dither used to encode the full-scale 1kHz tone. Similarly, the noisefloor in a spectrum taken with a dithered tone at –90dBFS (fig.4, cyan and magenta traces) is due to the dither. Repeating spectral analysis with "digital black" (blue and red traces) indicates that the CDi-XR's noisefloor is 20dB lower than that of dithered 16-bit data. With undithered 16-bit data representing a tone at exactly –90.31dBFS (fig.5), the three DC voltage levels described by the data were well resolved, and the waveform was perfectly symmetrical. An inconsequential 25µV positive DC offset is present in the right channel (red trace).

422Cyrusfig3

Fig.3 Cyrus CDi-XR, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 0dBFS (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

422Cyrusfig4

Fig.4 Cyrus CDi-XR, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS with 16-bit data (left channel cyan, right magenta) and with "digital black" (left blue, right red) (20dB/vertical div.).

422Cyrusfig5

Fig.5 Cyrus CDi-XR, waveform of undithered 16-bit, 1kHz sinewave at –90.31dBFS (left channel blue, right red).

As seen in fig.2, the Cyrus CD player featured very low levels of harmonic distortion. The third harmonic was the highest in level (fig.6), laying at just –94dB (0.002%). While higher harmonics can be seen in this graph, these were all below –110dB (0.0003%). Fig.6 was taken with the very high 100k ohm test load, but, commendably, none of the harmonics increased in level when I reduced the load to the current-hungry 600 ohms. Intermodulation distortion with a mix of equal levels of 19 and 20kHz tones was vanishingly low in level (fig.7), though the rise in the noisefloor centered on 10kHz that was present in fig.2 is also evident in this graph.

422Cyrusfig6

Fig.6 Cyrus CDi-XR, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave at 0dBFS, DC–1kHz, into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

422Cyrusfig7

Fig.7 Cyrus CDi-XR, HF intermodulation spectrum (DC–30kHz), 19+20kHz at 0dBFS into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

I tested the CDi-XR's rejection of word-clock jitter with the undithered Miller-Dunn J-Test signal (a high-level tone at one-quarter the sample rate over which is overlaid the least-significant bit toggled on and off at a frequency equivalent to the sample rate divided by 192). The Cyrus reproduced the odd-order harmonics of the LSB-level, low-frequency squarewave very close to the correct levels (fig.8, sloping green line), and no other sidebands were present. However, fig.8 also shows the rise in the high-frequency noisefloor that was also present in figs.2 and 7.

422Cyrusfig8

Fig.8 Cyrus CDi-XR, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 16-bit CD data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz.

As the Cyrus CDi-XR has digital outputs, to allow it to be used as a CD transport with a separate D/A processor, I examined the quality of those outputs. Fig.9 was taken from the TosLink output with J-Test data plotted over one "unit cycle." The eye pattern is wide open, with almost no blurring of the leading and trailing edges. The average jitter level, assessed with a 50Hz–100kHz bandwidth, was relatively high, at 2286 picoseconds (ps) compared with 340.5ps when I looped the Audio Precision SYS2722's TosLink output to its optical input. The jitter present in the CDi-XR's optical output will be inconsequential when the Cyrus is used with a D/A processor that has good jitter rejection, but the coaxial S/PDIF output, which offered a jitter level of 583.7ps, is to be preferred.

422Cyrusfig9

Fig.9 Cyrus CDi-XR, eye pattern of TosLink data output carrying 16-bit, 44.1kHz J-Test data (±2.5V vertical scale, 175ns horizontal scale).

The Cyrus CDi-XR offers generally good measured performance, although I do wish it had digital inputs. I suspect that its intrinsic performance is limited by the 16-bit CD medium.—John Atkinson


Footnote 1: See, for example, my measurements of an ATC CD player.
COMPANY INFO
Cyrus Audio Ltd.
US distributor: Fidelity Imports, LLC
Manalapan, New Jersey
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Michael King's picture

Appreciate the CD vs streaming comparisons and music recommendations. As one who listens to both formats, I question the necessity of a stand alone CD player. I purchased my first DAC in 2010. At the time I was in the market for a new CD player. The player I owned (McIntosh MCD201) had required two factory repairs for a faulty transport and I sold it. A salesperson talked me out of buying another CD player because it puts the owner at the mercy of the transport. I could relate. How many DVD players are out there? I spin CDs in an early 2000s Pioneer DV-353 feeding a Moon 280D through the entry level Transparent cable with wonderful results. If the Pioneer cacks out, I can replace it for little cost. Just sayin'.

partain's picture

Amen to that .!

If a magazine would pursue affordable audio and at least mention the elephant that might be in the room , as you have pointed out in this one , I'd be up for a subscription.

My need for million-dollar turntables is waning , no , it's morphing into disgust .

Michael Fremer's picture

Brings me immense pleasure!

partain's picture

Please , Sir .

Glotz's picture

Analog playback has many virtues that digital in any form, does not.

Nonetheless, it has been said many times in many publications that CD data fed from a transport has a different sound signature and higher SQ compared to just streaming. There obviously many factors at play that modifies that statement.

More importantly, many millions of CD owners have huge collections of compact discs. Many of those music lovers don't feel a need to spend countless hours transferring data from CD to digital storage, or even relegate their collections to a garage sale or used cd shop.

Many also enjoy interacting with their expensive audio gear, CD allows that, though nowhere near analog tape or vinyl.

Those with large CD collections see the value in this Cyrus product, regardless the perfunctory comments leveled at it...

jimtavegia's picture

I still have my PS1 and it still plays CDs. I have never had a transport fail in my audio systems including 3 old Sony DVPNS 755's (2003) and a Yamaha S1800 from 2007 and they are all used every day I have owned them. They are all DAC drivers (transports) except for the S1800 that still plays SACDs. None of the Sony's will play SACDs anymore. I have had one CD player/burner fail, but at 74 I consider myself lucky in that regard.

MBMax's picture

I suppose I'll rip my CD's to a server or migrate to more streaming one day. But for now, I really enjoy combing the library (LP's & CD's), looking for the perfect piece of music, loading it up and enjoying it and the booklet notes all over again.
It's a participation sport and I like as much participation as possible.

jimtavegia's picture

Should we not expect SOTA in a $2000 player if a $500 Project S2 DAC can be class A? I hope I am not being unfair?

ok's picture

quitted streaming. I don't need all this "new music" readily available at my hand. I like certain things and these things are eventually few. CDs and LPs - even PC disks for that matter - sound physically better for reasons uknown. After all they give me the feeling of earthly longtime friends, not bodyless facebook acolytes. Just me I suppose.

Allen Fant's picture

Excellent article- KM.
The CD is NOT dead. Far from it in 2022.

PeterPani's picture

I tried a lot of CD-Players. Playing digital over longer time fatigues always, compared to analog. Several years I went back to my Sony CDP-01 from 1983. There are differences compared to modern players. Some in better direction (directness, midrange), other in worse direction (treble - what's on the disc, without improving).

MBMax's picture

After years of searching, I finally found a digital solution that is a delightful, non-fatiguing way to listen to my CD's. Frankly, I never thought I'd enjoy them so much and I don't feel like I'm settling when I choose a CD over an LP anymore (though I still buy and love records to be sure). My find? An MHDT Orchid DAC. No doubt there are others out there of a similar design approach that give similar sonic results. Absolutely worth seeking out IMHO.

jimtavegia's picture

Pro-Ject S2 DAC's Something excellent I afford.

DougM's picture

When the CD was introduced an album cost $7 and a CD cost $15. Now a vinyl album is over $20 and a CD is still $15 or less. I will never go back to the hassle of cleaning discs and styli, replacing styli, and having the hassle of setting up a turntable with all the gauges and protractors, not to mention having to worry about isolation and storing all those huge discs. It's not worth all the cost and headaches for the arguably better sound of analog. I'm happy with my CDs and the gear I use to play them. They sound just fine to me, and I have no interest in paying a monthly fee to a streaming service to hear music I already own. The hipsters will soon tire of the vinyl fad and move on to the next fad to impress their shallow friends.

volvic's picture

I was at Princeton Record Exchange the other day, and judging from the first-year university students digging through the vinyl bins, I suspect this fad ain't ending anytime soon. I was the only one in the classical CD section and one of three in the jazz section.

SundayAudiophile's picture

A lot of marketing BS by Cyrus. Can't take the product seriously after such aggressive marketing based on misleading, borderline false information. "the company believes that CDs sound better than the same music does when it's streamed" - there's no technical reason why this should be the case when streaming lossless formats.

X