A FollowUp RoundUp

Three products were recently subjected to second opinions: I reviewed the revised RS250A version of HiFi Rose's RS250 streaming D/A preamplifier and the optional DC1 DAC module for Audio Research's I/50 integrated amplifier; Ken Micallef wrote about his time with the Volti Razz loudspeaker.

I reviewed the original HiFi Rose RS250 in December 2021. I wrote that this is "an extraordinarily versatile, affordable product" and that its sound quality suggested that nothing had been compromised in packing so many features into its small chassis. "Highly recommended," I concluded, "both as a streaming DAC and as an all-in-one hub for a high-end audio system." The RS250A ($2695) replaces the RS250's ESS ES9038Q2M two-channel DAC chip with the higher-performance ESS Sabre ES9028PRO chip and now supports PCM data formats up to 32/768 and DSD formats up to DSD512. I both auditioned the new version and performed a set of measurements. The result was that I extended my earlier recommendation to the new RS250A. "It is an elegant-looking, well-engineered, multipurpose component."

When I reviewed the Audio Research I/50 in September 2023, this tubed integrated amplifier ($5500) only had balanced and single-ended line-level analog inputs. Toward the end of the review period I was sent the optional DC1 DAC module, which adds $1000. As well as coaxial and optical S/PDIF inputs, this module has a USB port and a Bluetooth antenna to allow streaming from computers and smartphones.

Listening to CD data, the DAC module's tonal balance was a little darker than I was used to with the I/50 handling analog data. With hi-rez files fed to the USB input, kickdrum had slightly better articulation than CD and the overall presentation had a little more space between the instruments. Measurements indicated that the digital inputs have a resolution close to 18 bits. I concluded that the DAC module adds value to what is already a relatively high-value tubed integrated amplifier.

Tom Gibbs reviewed the Volti Razz loudspeaker ($7500/pair) in August 2020, writing that this three-way, high-sensitivity, hybrid-horn design's ability to portray music of any genre with scale, realism, and thrilling dynamics was unmatched by any loudspeaker he'd had in his system. "The Razzes demonstrate a lovely midrange liquidity, but there's no sacrifice of detail," he concluded.

Ken Micallef had previously reviewed Volti's more expensive Rival speaker in June 2017, so spent some time using the Razz, driving it with both tubed and solid state amplification, in order to offer a second opinion on its sound. "That second opinion can be useful for readers—new experience in a different room with different ancillary components and a different set of ears," he wrote about FollowUp reviews in general. He echoed TG's recommendation of the Razz, deciding that its demeanor seemed very much the same as that of the Rival, "just on a smaller scale, with the same balanced sound, even temperament, and genre-agnostic capabilities . . . The Razz will get you close to the Rival experience for considerably less money."

COMMENTS
David Harper's picture

" kickdrum had slightly better articulation than CD and the overall presentation had a little more space between the instruments".Really? You have a very active imagination. Did you A/B back and forth between the two? Or is your audio memory so unusual and extraordinary that you actually remember exactly what you heard a few days ago? Or yesterday? Or a week ago? I'm impressed because if I attempted ,by listening consecutively, to the two sources that you describe I would have no idea if there was any difference.

MatthewT's picture

Can make you so angry and bitter. My condolences.

John Atkinson's picture
David Harper wrote:
"kickdrum had slightly better articulation than CD and the overall presentation had a little more space between the instruments." Really? You have a very active imagination. Did you A/B back and forth between the two?

Yes. And levels were matched.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

Anton's picture

I am sure this will fail to satisfy David, but well done.

Glotz's picture

David. David. David.

David.

JohnnyThunder2.0's picture

Just because you can't hear differences you assume everyone can't. Like if you were color blind would you admonish everyone else for seeing vivid colors? Give it a rest.

The Tinkerer's picture

where on this deaf-doll™ that the Audio Research I/50 touched you? Just point to it.

hollowman's picture

JA wrote: "Listening to CD data..."
What a coincidence ... I've been wondering about JUST that part of JA's comment.
When you play a CD, even in a dac-less transport, I've never been clear about the FORMAT the CD data is in -- and how it is aggregated and chunked and "streamed" into downstream sections (laser pickup --> decoder --> digital filter --> DAC --> i/v or output stage. ) Sometimes, especially in older digital gear, there are RAM chips helping out the decoder or DF). Purportedly, it is .cda (CDA) ; which is different from WAV (a computer CONTAINER format).
All things held equal, playing Red Book CD's in a GOOD / dedicated Red Book CD player is best sounding. That's where the MAGIC lives. Recent experiments, in my listening sessions, seem to support this.
REFS:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_Disc_Digital_Audio

kai's picture

CD Data - meaning the pure audio data, not the format it‘s packed on the physical medium - is simple 16 bit 44.1 kHz PCM lossless format.

Really nothing special, and easy to handle.
The audio content will not change, no matter what lossless format it will be repacked e.g. to use it in a streamer.

From an audiophile standpoint now it could be argued that this or that medium or device will play the same data better, but technically there‘s no difference.

BTW: I started to listen to CD (or vinyl) more often recently, as the versions of the same music, available on streaming, are constantly being replaced by “new remastered” ones that have changed to the worse to stupidly squeezed out the last bit of loudness, sacrificing dynamics and sound quality.

Glotz's picture

I love the form factor and the modern-tech look. So many colors too. It sounds fantastic and what a great high-value system suggestion. My dealer has this and I need to hear it again during Saturday Coffee sessions. AXPONA wasn't enough time with it.

Ortofan's picture

... the I/50 with LS3/5a speakers, or similar small speakers from Harbeth or Spendor.

David Harper's picture

...that I seem powerless to resist. But I'm working on it. I had the same problem with catholic forums online. And on Fox news website. To it's credit stereophile hasn't banned me like catholic forums did. Catholic "authority" has very little tolerance for dissent.

georgehifi's picture

KAI:"available on streaming, are constantly being replaced by “new remastered” ones that have changed to the worse to stupidly squeezed out the last bit of loudness, sacrificing dynamics and sound quality."

So true that's when you go DRDB to get whatever's got the highest DR. EG: Yellow Brick Road issues and re-issues http://tinyurl.com/2m7h4elt

"If you have no quiet, you have no loud" Dynamic Range Data Base. Please donate it keeps our music real

Cheers George

X