Monitor Audio Platinum 300 3G loudspeaker Page 2

A track I have recently been using to judge a speaker's low-frequency behavior is "All Too Well (Taylor's Version)" from Taylor Swift's album Red (24/96 FLAC, Big Machine Records/Qobuz). At 2:25, when Swift sings "'Cause there we are again in the middle of the night," the bass line drops an octave. The effect sounds awesome even on the little KEF LS50s, but on the Monitor Audio with the ports open, it was all too much.

I blocked both ports on each speaker and listened again to the low-frequency warble tones. Now the tones were reproduced evenly down to 63Hz, but the 50Hz and 40Hz tones were slightly suppressed. The 32Hz room mode was still boosted a little, but now I couldn't hear the 25Hz and 20Hz tones.

I ended up removing the foam plug from the bottom ports, which kept the magnificence of the dropped bass on "All Too Well (Taylor's Version)" but didn't allow the excited room mode to get in the way of the music. With just one port blocked on each speaker, the low frequencies offered good extension and weight coupled with excellent leading-edge definition. The kickdrum on the Taylor Swift track was well-differentiated from the bass guitar, which was similarly pitched.

The image of Swift's voice was palpably focused. In this respect, the big Monitor Audios' imaging accuracy was more like what you get from a pair of high-performance minimonitors like my reference LS50s.

I have been a fan of Taj Mahal since he performed live at Stereophile's Hi-Fi '95 show in Los Angeles, accompanying himself on piano and guitar. After reading Tony Scherman's review of Taj Mahal's Savoy in the July issue, I added the album (24/96 FLAC, Stony Plain Records/Qobuz) to my Roon library. Mahal's croaky vocals were stably presented as a narrow central image, and the individual images of the women singing the refrain in "Mood Indigo" were clearly defined and spread across the stage.

What you hear in the way of imaging accuracy will depend, of course, on how a recording was made. While Sasha Matson justifiably praised the then–20-year-old Barbra Streisand's singing in his June 2023 Recording of the Month review of Live at the Bon Soir (Legacy/Columbia), he noted that the piano sounded like it was "recorded in a coatroom." Listening to the 24/96 Qobuz stream of "Cry Me a River" on the Platinum 300 3Gs, the piano sounded more recessed than distant, but I was transfixed by how—forgive me for again using this word—palpably the speakers presented the image of Barbra's voice.

In 1992, I recorded Canadian pianist Robert Silverman live in concert with a spaced pair of omnidirectional microphones. The result is an image of the Steinway piano that is somewhat diffuse regardless of the imaging performance of the loudspeakers. Listening to Silverman's empathetic reading of Schubert's Moments Musicaux (16/44.1 ALAC, Stereophile STPH005-2) on the Platinum 300 3Gs, I heard the piano clearly set within the warmly supportive acoustic of the Albuquerque church in which I had made the recording. It was particularly so when the Platinum 300s were driven by the Audio Research I/50 using its 4 ohm output transformer taps.

As I note in the Measurements sidebar, the Platinum 300 3G is a relatively demanding load. When I hooked up the Monitor Audios to the tubed Audio Research I/50, I was concerned that the speakers would ask too much from the amplifier, even from its 4 ohm outputs. However, this didn't appear to be case, even with the Taylor Swift track, as long as I kept the spl at the listening chair below 88dB(C) (slow ballistics), as measured with the Studio Six iPhone app.

Looking back, I see I haven't commented yet on the Platinum 300 3G's degree of tonal neutrality. This speaker is commendably uncolored. Solo piano recordings are very revealing of problems in the upper midrange, but the piano on the Silverman concert recording sounded both natural and full range, with no notes emphasized. The only aspect of the Monitor Audio's sonic signature that did occasionally concern me was a slight emphasis to recorded sibilance, more noticeable with the solid state Naim and Parasound amplifiers than with the tubed Audio Research I/50 or, paradoxically perhaps, the class-D NAD. The I/50's top octave starts to roll off prematurely into low impedances (footnote 1), which could account somewhat for its mitigation of this slight sibilance, though the shape of the Platinum 300 3G's impedance magnitude trace (fig.1 in the Measurements sidebar) suggests that this rolloff will be minimal.

I finished my critical listening sessions with Joni Mitchell at Newport (24/192 FLAC, Rhino/Qobuz), recorded live in 2022. What can I say? With its lack of coloration and neutral tonal balance, Monitor Audio's Platinum 300 3G did justice not just to Mitchell's age-deepened voice but to those of all the singers featured on this album.

Summing up
With its clean, uncolored midrange, its well-controlled, extended low frequencies, its well-defined stereo imaging, and its ability to play much louder than my usual minimonitors, Monitor Audio's elegant-looking Platinum 300 3G is a high-performance loudspeaker. Strongly recommended.


Footnote 1: See fig.1 here.

COMPANY INFO
Monitor Audio
24 Brook Rd., Rayleigh
Essex SS6 7XJ, England, UK
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Auditor's picture

They haven't manufactured anything in Britain in a long time.

MhtLion's picture

Monitor Audio Linkedin page lists out that it has 76 employees including 62 employees in United Kingdom. I would guess it does not have a manufacturing facility in U.K., but outsource the manufacturing. But, personally it looks like a British company to me since 80% of employees are in U.K.
https://www.linkedin.com/company/monitor-audio-ltd/people/

On other hand, KEF Linkedin page has 303 employees world wide including 40 in United Kingdom. Again, I would assume there is no manufacturing facility in U.K. And, I wouldn't personally call it a British company although who cares about my personal opinion.
https://www.linkedin.com/company/kef/people/

But, who knows. These companies might use different matrix. Monitor Audio may have a parent company with a totally different legal name, and I would not know it by doing a quick search. The editors in Stereophile must have better insight, but I doubt anyone will ever mention it. Anyway, in the modern days, there are Asian companies under Western company brands/shells. Not saying it's wrong. Just an observation.

Auditor's picture

KEF is a different case. They were bought by a Hong Kong company in the 90's. A lot of their speakers are now made in China. But their top-tier products are still made in England.

MhtLion's picture

With 40 employees in U.K., I would personally doubt they do any meaningful manufacturing in U.K.

Bowers & Wilkins has 365 employees world wide including 185 in United Kingdom. Undoubtedly, I will call it a British company. And, I'm very surprised that KEF is as big as B&W in terms of the employee counts.
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bowerswilkins/people/

Auditor's picture

KEF's Muon, Blade and Reference loudspeakers are all made in Maidstone, England. That's a fact.

As these are their more expensive models, they certainly sell much less than their R Series, Q Series and LS50 speakers. Apparently a few dozen workers is enough in Maidstone.

MhtLion's picture

Good to know that KEF produces those three in England. But, with a total of 40 employees in U.K. (see the breakout below) I would guess that explains why there is a huge price gap between these and others.

11 Engineering
8 Marketing
8 Operations
6 Business Development
5 Information Technology
5 Sales
3 Arts and Design
2 Human Resources
2 Program and Project Management
2 Research
2 Consulting
1 Military and Protective Services
1 Customer Success and Support

Auditor's picture

Let me just clarify what bothers me about "British manufacturer".

To me, Monitor Audio is British company or brand.

The average person who hears or reads "British manufacturer" will think the company manufactures its wares in Britain. Hence, calling Monitor Audio a British manufacturer is misleading.

Harbeth, Spendor or ATC are examples of British manufacturers. They are based in Britain and that's where they design and build their products.

MhtLion's picture

Agreed. I would think MA is British company. A British manufacturer? For the same reasons you have, I would think it's misleading. But, I think MA is at least more British than KEF.

Another trend. Many high-end brands have a number of products which were conceptualized, designed, manufactured, and tested by the vendors. They use something like "leasing manufacturing capacity" which means you are leasing your vendor's staffs and facilities, so they can legally say the products are produced by themselves. I think it's misleading, but I suppose it's legal. And, people who know about it never talk about it.

MatthewT's picture

And the the UK makes lots of things.

Auditor's picture

I had a brain cramp there. Thanks for pointing that out! I went back and corrected my post.

DougM's picture

Most British and American speakers are now made in China. Only B&W's 800 series are made in the UK, and the rest are MIC. The Klipsch Heritage speakers are made in Hope, AK, and the rest are made in China. Tannoy's legacy large expensive concentric driver models are made in Scotland, and the remainder are made in China. Polks are all MIC, as are the majority of JBL's (if not all), all Wharfedales, etc.

Ortofan's picture

... Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire - which is located in England, not China.

https://www.wharfedale.co.uk/dovedale/

Electrophone's picture

„In 2020, the IAG Group’s internal investment continues with the reintroduction of manufacturing at the IAG UK site.
A wave of premium, made in the UK products will be unveiled from 2021, embracing the nostalgia and legacy of the IAG Group brands.“

whyareyoubothered's picture

What is this affinity of audiophiles to know the specifics of where and what type of people made their equipment? Why does that matter if the end product is of superb quality?

Kennygwood's picture

I'm interested that there are no comments about the Hf response, the peak or dropout, whichever way you want to look at it. After Monitor audio makes a big selling point of their move to an in house designed and perfected mpd the response appears worse than the ribbon tweeter in the first PL designs and their gold mk4 loudspeakers. Am I missing something here?

X