ARCAM Radia A25 integrated amplifier Specifications

Sidebar 1: Specifications

Description: Solid state, class-G stereo integrated amplifier outputting up to 100Wpc into 8 ohms (20dBW), 165Wpc into 4 ohms (19.2dBW). Analog inputs: 3 single-ended, one MM phono, all on RCA. Digital inputs: 2 S/PDIF coaxial, 1 TosLink, and 1 USB-C. The DAC is based on a ES9280A PRO chip with three user-selectable filters, supporting PCM sampling rates up to 384kHz and DSD up to DSD1024. Bluetooth including Qualcomm AptX Adaptive, AAC, and SBC. Analog outputs: loudspeaker, variable pre-out (RCA), and (1/8" 3mm) front panel headphone jack.
Dimensions: 17" (431mm) W × 3.27" (83mm) H × 13.5" (344mm) D. Weight 19.8lb (9kg).
Finish: Black.
Serial number of unit reviewed: HJ0009-IN0001104. Designed in Cambridge, England, built in China.
Price: $1499. Approximate number of US dealers: 212. Warranty: 2 years.
Manufacturer: ARCAM, The West Wing, Stirling House, Waterbeach, Cambridge CB25 9QE, UK. US distributor: Harman Luxury Audio Group, 8500 Balboa Blvd., Northridge, CA 91329. Tel: (888) 691-4171. Web: arcam.co.uk.

COMPANY INFO
ARCAM
The West Wing, Stirling House
Waterbeach
Cambridge CB25 9QE, UK
(888) 691-4171
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
cognoscente's picture

now we are talking, finally a review of a stereo item that is affordable and therefore an option for must of us. And clearly the pro and cons stated (the A and B rating for the different parts).

Physical CDs sound better than HiRes steamed music because data traffic is the largest cost item for those providers, they have every interest in not sending the best / heaviest file, so they don't do that. Despite the so-called HiRes resolutions, such a streamed file weighs 1/4 to 1/5 of the same song in full CD quality. Look at the MB's of files and you will know which one has more information. As far as I'm concerned, end of the discussion. But I'm just a layman and music enthusiast (who thinks (to?) simply), I'm not a pro.

cognoscente's picture

btw, this is exactly why I buy and download music (and not stream it - I use my iPhone as an iPod for storage). Sometimes I buy HiRes files if I think it is really better (recent recording and the right music for it) so I usually buy just CD quality (44/16) files. Didn't I read here recently that the vast majority of exhibitors at the Montreal fair also used 44/16 files to demostrate their equipment?

PressureX Blood Support's picture

Pressure X™ is a unique blend of natural ingredients that work together to promote healthy blood pressure levels and support overall heart health. This blend includes odorless garlic extract and hawthorn berries, which have been used for centuries to naturally promote healthy blood pressure levels. Additionally, cayenne fruit, parsley root, olive leaves, hops flowers, valerian root, and reishi mushrooms work together to provide a comprehensive approach to support cardiovascular health.

Read More :-
https://www.facebook.com/pressurexbloodsupport
https://speckn.com/pressure-x-blood-support

hb72's picture

.. and why I miss Audiostream: In my experience, streaming highres files (here from a modestly priced pro-ject stream box s2 ultra, powered by some lin PSU, and sourcing music from Qobuz or a FLAC filled SSD attached to the streamer via usb, all in all, way better in SQ than a PC): IMHO SQ is not necessarily softer nor harder, but, with ethernet connected, all results are possible, also dependent on "the network" ie, the "quality" of lan cables, galvanic isolator (cheap or expensive or absent), choice of network switches, their own (lin or SM)PSU. In the best case, music is snappy, clean and touchy, and if things are suboptimal, music can come across as etherical, softened w.r.t. PRaT, and Monet-like where it wasn't intended (though that can be nice too), or OTOH overly rough. A rabbit hole, and, seemingly, everything matters, except perhaps whether Roon is used or not.
I hear there are streamers out there that are more indifferent to "network quality".
And yes, higher resolution files usually sound a bit better (finer, easy to tell), identical mastering provided.

PS: a shoutout to Jim Austin for his latest article on an expensive network switch in the new edition of Stereophile: admirable in approach and attitude when it comes to finding the right balance at a tricky topic.

cheers
HB72

Duval's picture

Herb Reichert is one of my heroes, but to be completely honest, this review reads a bit like loveless commissioned work.

Why is it not even mentioned that the A25 is a 'Chip-Amp' presumably using something like LM3886 Chips instead of discrete transistors?

And why is it not mentioned that Arcam belongs to the Harman Group, which in turn belongs to Samsung?

Ortofan's picture

... the Radia A25 is a "chip-amp"?

https://www.audioholics.com/amplifier-reviews/arcam-a25-integrated-amp/A25internal.jpg/image

Duval's picture

@Ortofan

I stand corrected. Presumably my own image search for the A25 showed the image of a predecessor. It seems Arcam had various 'chip amps' on offer but the A25 is not one of them.

Glotz's picture

With Alta Audio Alyssa speakers and it was absolutely impressive. I have a friend that had a 90's Arcam amp finally give up the ghost a few years back and even he dropped his disdain from the painful experience (as no one wants their components to die) after hearing this demo.

The Alyssa's were most impressive with bass that fooled 2 other visually-impaired friends that were there into wondering how a small monitor speaker like that could produce such powerful bass. There was no over-warm balance on very deep tenor vocals and the speaker was a sealed design, which was even more impressive. For $5k for the speaker and really $8k for the entire system on display, this was an ear opening for everyone in the room.

This amp hits way above its weight at $1500.

Oh and Herb was pleasure to listen to in his panel with Steve Guttenberg. Sad I missed meeting him... my newbie audio friends had other plans in mind.

X