Classé Delta Mono monoblock power amplifier Page 2

The first surprise using the Delta Monos was that the meters showed that I almost never used an average level greater than 6W to drive the Vimberg Mino loudspeakers that I reviewed in April. (The meters actually maxed out at "3W," but as they are calibrated in 8 ohm watts and the Mino is a 4 ohm speaker, the indicated power needed to be doubled.) A power of 6W into 4 ohms is equivalent to a voltage of 4.9V RMS. If the music I typically listen to has a high crest factor of 10dB, that means the instantaneous peak voltage would be 15.5V. This is just below the amplifier's maximum voltage available in class-A into 8 ohms, which is 16.73V, equivalent to 35W. It is safe to say, therefore, that throughout the month I auditioned the Delta Monos, the amplifiers only rarely moved from class-A to class-AB operation.

The second surprise was how hard it was to get a handle on the Delta Mono's sound character. You know how it is with reviewers: We set the newcomer up in the reference system and cue up the test tracks that have served us well through the years at telling us what is going on.

My favorite test track for dynamics is "Fit Song" from Cornelius's Sensuous: la musique du 21st siécle (16/44.1k ALAC file, ripped from CD, Everloving/Warner Bros. EVE016). With the Delta Monos driven by the Vimberg speakers, the beautifully clean drum samples on "Fit Song" had me dancing in my seat. And when the kickdrum was doubled by dropped-bass synth notes, the low frequencies effortlessly filled my room. Similarly, when I played the test track I use to judge bass extension and weight, my recording of Jonas Nordwall performing Widor's Organ Symphony No.5 (24/88.2 AIFF file), which has high-level spectral content down almost to 20Hz, nothing was missing from the sound produced by the Classé/Vimberg combo.

620classe.corner

However, with the iron-fisted control exerted by the Delta Monos, I did feel I had to remove the plugs from the speakers' uppermost ports in order to add back a little midbass bloom with the Widor. This didn't detract from the clarity of the repeated 16th-note bass line in "Last Train Home," from Pat Metheny's Still Life (Talking) (16/44.1k ALAC file, ripped from CD, Geffen GEFD 24145-2).

I like to use solo piano recordings to examine an amplifier's midrange articulation and evenness of balance. I cued up Evelina Vorontsova's recording of Rachmaninoff's Moments Musicaux (16/44.1 ALAC file ripped from CD, STH Quality Classics CD 1416092). The third of these six short pieces, in B minor, is my favorite, with its plaintive, almost gloomy melody leading into the march-like bridge section. The midrange transparency of the Classé amplifiers was impressive, Vorontsova's Steinway sounding appropriately harmonically complex. At the same time, the differences between my usual PS Audio DirectStream DAC and the Weiss DAC502 that I have in for review were laid bare with this recording. (More on that in my Weiss review next month.)

Though the Vimberg Mino's on-axis behavior is superbly flat, when I measured its spatially averaged response in my listening room (footnote 2), I found that there was slightly more energy in the mid-treble than was strictly accurate due to the Mino's off-axis behavior. While I was aware of this characteristic with the Classé amplifiers driving the speakers, it wasn't exacerbated. However, the two octaves above this region did sound slightly suppressed; I suspect that the transparency of the Classé amps made what the speakers were doing more apparent. A favorite track of mine from electric guitar virtuoso Jeff Beck is "Cause We've Ended as Lovers" from Performing This Week . . . Live at Ronnie Scott's (16/44.1k FLAC, Tidal/Eagle Records), not only because of Beck's masterfully lyrical playing but also because this was the first recording on which I heard young Australian bass guitarist Tal Wilkenfeld demonstrate her mastery of the instrument. Beck and Wilkenfeld sounded magnificent, of course, but Vinnie Colaiuta's cymbals sounded a touch darker than I was used to. Even so, the Delta Mono's high frequencies were impressively clean and smooth.

620classe.fan

As you'd expect from a pair of monoblocks, the Delta Monos' stereo imaging was superbly stable and well-defined. When I recorded male-voice choir Cantus performing Eric Whitacre's "Lux Aurumque" in Indiana's Goshen College in June 2007—it was released on While You Are Alive (CD Baby 5637240534)—the nine singers were positioned in an arc in front of the array of six microphones. Before I started capturing the performance, I got each singer in turn to say his name. That way, when I prepared the mixdown, I could make sure that I wasn't distorting the stereo image. However, I accepted a slight broadening of the images of the singers at the edges of the soundstage in order to preserve enough of the bloom of the hall's glorious ambience. Listening to the MQA-encoded 24-bit, 88.2kHz master file of "Lux Aurumque" with the Classé-driven Vimbergs, that is exactly what I heard: tightly focused images of the singers in the center and slightly more diffuse images to the sides, with excellent soundstage depth overall. To draw a photographic analogy, the Delta Monos offer superb image acuity.

Comparing
The Classé Delta Monos replaced the $16,990/pair Parasound Halo JC 1+s that I reviewed in the June 2020 issue. Like the Delta Mono, the Parasound is heavily biased into partial class-A operation, though with 25W available in class-A rather than the Delta's 35W. I wrote in my review that "the Parasound's high frequencies sounded more like what I experience from a good tube amplifier." With levels matched at 1kHz—straightforward to achieve because the Parasound and Classé have almost the same 29dB gain—I played an album I had mentioned in my Parasound review: Christian Tetzlaff performing the Beethoven Violin Concerto with Robin Ticciati conducting the Deutsches Symphonie-Orchester Berlin (24/48k FLAC, Ondine 1334).

Listening first to the Delta Monos, there was excellent depth to the orchestra, and there was palpable space around repeated notes on the timps that open the work's first movement. The image of Tetzlaff's violin was stable, narrow, and appropriately presented in front of the orchestra. Turning to the Parasounds—easier to write than to do with four large, heavy amplifiers—after allowing them to warm up, the Halo JC 1+s did have a tubelike presentation, in that the lower midrange had a touch more bloom than through the Delta Monos. The Parasound's highs were a tad lighter-balanced than the Classé's, but soundstage depth and definition were very close. There was slightly more space around the images of the violin and timps with the Halo JC 1+s. In the bass, the Jonas Nordwall organ recording revealed that the Delta Monos exerted slightly more control over the Mino's woofers than the JC 1+s'—and again, there was a little more space apparent with the Parasounds. Though the Delta Mono was less "tubelike" than the JC 1+, it excelled in the articulation and spatial definition of the various ranks of organ pipes Nordwall uses.

My long-term reference amplifiers are a pair of Lamm M1.2 Reference monoblocks ($33,990/pair), which, although less powerful than the Classés and the Parasounds, also operate in class-A at the bottom of their dynamic range. With levels again matched with a 1kHz tone—the Lamm is 2.6dB more sensitive than the Classé—the organ recording sounded more laid back than it did with either of the other amplifiers, and more upper-bass bloom was audible. This was also noticeable with the bass guitar and the lower-pitched toms on the Jeff Beck track, though the Lamm's top-octave balance was similar to the Delta Mono's. Overall, I felt the more expensive Lamm was a slightly better match for the Vimberg Mino speakers, though I suspect the Classé Delta Mono would work better with a sweeter-balanced speaker such as the Magico M2 I reviewed in February 2020. A close-run thing, nevertheless.

620classe.2

More listening
I worked on this review during the first month of New York's stay-at-home, social distancing mandate. Maintaining a daily routine was an important part of coping with the feeling of isolation, and I got into the habit of listening weekday nights at 6pm EST to BBC Radios 3's Night Tracks immersive mashups, courtesy of Roon's Live Radio function. But one Saturday evening in April, instead of Night Tracks, the BBC was rebroadcasting the 2015 performance of Max Richter's eight-hour epic, Sleep (footnote 3), because, in their words, "when hours seemingly stretch into the distance, Sleep offers a mindful way to forget everything going on around us and to enter another world."

The first 19 minutes of Sleep consist of a solo piano hypnotically vamping a simple chord sequence, punctuated with deep synth-bass pedal notes. Even though the audio was encoded as a 128kbps MP3 stream, the sense of space with the PS Audio/Classé/Vimberg system was impressive and the low bass notes sounded magnificent. I was pulled into Richter's vision—a great audio system in service to the emotional relief offered by music.

I could only listen to the first 90 minutes of the Sleep broadcast, through excursions into sections for string quartet, solo soprano, and looped samples, so the following day I streamed an album of excerpts (24/96 MQA FLAC, DG/ Tidal). The recording venue was different—AIR Studios London rather than the Reading Room of the Wellcome Collection in London—but the transparent window into music offered by the Delta Monos allowed me to clearly hear that despite the low bit rate, the broadcast was superior in terms of space and depth to the commercial release, though the piano was not as well in tune.

Summing up
I greatly enjoyed my time with the Classé Delta Monos. Their transparency, coupled with smooth high frequencies and excellent low-frequency control and articulation, were addictive. Highly recommended.


Footnote 2: See fig.7 here.

Footnote 3: This performance was available for streaming here until May 11 2020.

COMPANY INFO
Classé, a division of Sound United, LLC
380, rue McArthur Saint-Laurent
Québec H4T 1X8
Canada
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Bogolu Haranath's picture

Are you ready for a brand new beat? ...... Summer's here and the time is right ...... For dancing in the 'seat' (street) :-) ......

supamark's picture

"Fortunately, Sound United, whose brands include Denon, Marantz, Polk, Definitive Technology, and Boston Acoustics, then acquired Classé."

Sound United has shuttered Boston Acoustics, the brand effectively no longer exists. Per Wiki, "Currently they maintain the brand name, but no engineering is budgeted and there is no future production planned for Boston Acoustics." Y'all should probably stop mentioning Boston Acoustics when talking about Sound United, except to note that they liquidate some of the brands they aquire. Maybe they'll sell the brand name to someone who wants to make (sealed box) speakers... but doubtful.

Ortofan's picture

... active cooling solution, then try the Rotel Michi S5 or M8.

https://www.hifinews.com/content/rotel-michi-p5s5-prepower-amplifier-lab-report

https://www.rotel-inzahlungnahme.de/fileadmin/daten_rotel/Rotel_MICHI_Stereo_01_20_-_Der_Weg_der_Vollendung.pdf

John Atkinson's picture
Ortofan wrote:
If want a power amp with an active cooling solution, then try the Rotel Michi S5 or M8.

Stereophile will be reviewing the Rotel Michi S5 in a fall issue.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

Bogolu Haranath's picture

It would be interesting to see MF review the Rotel Michi M8 (1080W/8 Ohms and 1800W/4 Ohms) with his Wilson Alexx speakers :-) ........

rom661's picture

Right. I'm auditioning the Classe stereo amp right now. You're right of course. The fact that the Rotel and the Classe have cooling fans makes them equivalent. Also, please note, a Hyundai and a Ferrari both run on petrol so, of course, they are the same. It's nice that you apparently like Rotel. I sold them for years. Your comment is nonsensical.

Ortofan's picture

... chi-chi Mundorf capacitors.

With Rotel, you have to settle for British patented slit-foil, high-efficiency, low-ESR bulk storage capacitors.

Mikk's picture

I always enjoy gear reviews, but can't help feeling that using a few other speakers with this amp would provide greater insight into how it performs, overall.
Given the amps price, and the apparent engineering that's gone into it, i imagine Classe would have hoped it got a more thorough workout too?
Sorry to nitpick an otherwise detailed review!
(Edit- apologies if recent events within Stereophile made further tests not do-able).

John Atkinson's picture
Mikk wrote:
I always enjoy gear reviews, but can't help feeling that using a few other speakers with this amp would provide greater insight into how it performs, overall.

That's a valid point, but it wasn't possible during the time I had the Classe amplifiers in my system.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

Bogolu Haranath's picture

MF or JA2 could do a follow-up review of the Classe amps with the full-range speakers they have :-) ......

georgehifi's picture

Classic con yet again, manufacturers understating the 8ohm wattage by 27% to make the 4ohm look as though it doubles. and the 2ohm becomes even more of a joke. When will this industry con stop?
Would have had a chance if top and bottom were both N channel fets.

Cheers George

Jim Austin's picture

I would call this "conservatively rated." You call it a con?

There is a common misunderstanding that doubling into half the impedance is a crucial metric. It only matters if you'll be operating the amp at or near its maximum power. What matters is having enough power to drive the load. For power-hungry 4 ohm speakers, it's much better to have a 380W amplifier that outputs 610W into 4 ohms than to have a 200W amplifier that doubles its output into 4 ohms and so provides 400W. For a low-sensitivity 8 ohm speaker, 380 ohms is better than 300.

If I were a manufacturer, and I knew about this widespread misconception--that doubling is important regardless of the output power--then I'd be tempted to under-specify the 8 ohm impedance, too. In any case, underspecifying the power is not a con.

Jim Austin, Editor
Stereophile

Ortofan's picture

... power measurements, is there any plan to include in the reviews some form of transient peak power (aka dynamic headroom) testing, perhaps using a 200 ms burst signal, as was discussed in the following article?

https://www.stereophile.com/asweseeit/489/index.html

The article also suggests that equipment would be measured prior to sending it out for listening tests, in part to cull under-performing (let alone defective) samples. Was this procedure ever implemented?

michelesurdi's picture

could you tell us exactly how to go about level matching?

Bogolu Haranath's picture

They place both components side by side and place a 'spirit level' on top of them and then level match ..... Just kidding :-) .......

John Atkinson's picture
michelesurdi wrote:
could you tell us exactly how to go about level matching?

I use the 1kHz, -20dBFS warble tone on Stereophile's Editor's Choice CD and equalize the RMS output voltages at the loudspeaker terminals to within 0.1dB.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

michelesurdi's picture

hooboy,what a scream

georgehifi's picture

"I would call this "conservatively rated." You call it a con?"

Ok Jim, then why wasn't the 4ohm figure conservatively rated as well by the manufacturer?? It's almost spot on, out by just 2% on what JA measured?? Not 27%!!!! like their 8ohm figure

A blind man can see what the manufacturers are doing, and it just keeps getting done in their specs, "it's a con", and it's about time you guys called them out on it being reviewers, at least JA puts up the measurements, but his silence is a little muted about it.

You guys used to get yourselves and us sooo excited with those big Krell like amps, because when you tested them they did almost double down to 1ohm!!! let alone 2ohms, with words like you can weld off these speaker outputs!!!! And now with speakers like the Alexia ect ect, this spec is even more important.

I'm seeing even more exaggerated examples of "this con" with Class-D, when/if the 2ohm wattage specs are mentioned

Cheers George

Jim Austin's picture

It is possible that some companies understate their 8 ohm power output in order to make it appear that the output doubles into half the load. But if they do so, it is a marketing decision aimed at people who do not understand what matters and what doesn't. As I wrote above, what matters (among much else) is not doubling but the maximum power an amplifier can deliver to a particular load. If a company understates its power output into 8 ohms in order to appear to double into 4 ohms, then, to people who understand, they are making the product look worse, not better. If it is an attempt at a con, then it is a failed attempt. To those with a correct understanding, they would be making themselves look worse, not better.

Jim Austin, Editor
Stereophile

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Some companies like PS Audio specify their power amp output as minimum power outputs ....... For example, minimum power output into 8 Ohms .... Minimum power output into 4 Ohms etc . .....

Hi-Fi News measures dynamic power outputs in addition to continuous power outputs for the amplifiers ...... In many cases, lot of amplifiers put out more power during dynamic output than during continuous output :-) ......

georgehifi's picture

Whatever you say to protect them Jim, doesn't get around the fact that their own specified 8ohm wattage is grossly underrated and in the same breath their own specified 4ohm wattage is correct. And to me it's done just to make it "look like" it can double down.
And the only way it's exposed is in JA's bench tests which 90% of your readers have no idea what their looking at, they just like to read the reviews.

THEY CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS

Cheers George

Jim Austin's picture

I'm protecting logic and good sense.

Is power in an amplifier bad or good? Because if power is good, then perpetrating a "con" by "grossly understating" it makes no sense. I'm not expecting you to change your mind, but I do want to make sure that other people reading these comments are not misled.

Jim Austin, Editor
Stereophile

Bogolu Haranath's picture

George is making much ado about nothing :-) ..........

Lars Bo's picture

It seems to me, that EPDRs of 1-2 ohms are not at all uncommon for speakers typically matched with big, drive-it-all power amps (or vice versa).

Bogolu Haranath's picture

Speakers with EPDRs of 1-2 Ohms sound better with amps like the Classe Delta monos :-) .......

georgehifi's picture

"grossly understating" it makes no sense.

Yes understate by 27%!!! on the 8ohm figure. Then by only 2% on the 4ohm figure. (You never see them or others overstate the 8ohm as then will make the 4ohm will look real sad indeed)

I consider that a gross understatement, for a means to baffle/confuse/con/deceive call it what you wish.
It's not right that so many manufactures are doing this now, this is not an isolated indecent, it's only serves one purpose.
I've been calling on this now for a couple of years, it has crept into the manufacturers specs and it's not right.

Cheers George

RoryB's picture

Whether chicken or egg, it is a marketing decision. That's why they are called "nominal" specifications. You're only making yourself look silly.

You got 27% more than you paid for? This is an OUTRAGE! (27% more is right around 2 dB, based on 20 log 1.27. Not enough extra to smoke a tweeter.)

Edit: So my math was wrong. Because power comes from the square of voltage, the actual formula is 20 log 1.127, which comes out to 1.03 dB. Cha-ching. Here, let me turn that down 1 dB for you.

a.wayne's picture

Great measurements there Classe , fantastic except for the 2 ohm current limiting , these measurements puts this Classe into a similiar league to the big Boulder ...

Regards

Lee S.'s picture

JA, A few years ago, you reviewed the Classe CA-M600 mono amps and gave them high marks. You said they were the best sounding amplifiers you had reviewed at the time. Your review immensely influenced my decision to purchase a pair. Best sounding amps I have ever owned. I know it’s been several years, but could you comment on the sound attributes between the CA-M600 and the new Delta monos to the best of your recollection. Thanks, Lee

georgehifi's picture

Once again, and your silly if you can't see it.

"Yes understate by 27%!!! on the 8ohm figure. Then by only 2% on the 4ohm figure to make it look better."

Cheers George

Mike-48's picture

JA, I auditioned a previous Classe amp (CA-2300), and while I thought the sound was wonderful, I could occasionally hear the fan running during quiet passages. Are the fans in these monoblocks quieter?

X