External view comparing the E-Mu Walnut (left) with CAL! (right).
Sound QualityThe E-Mu Walnut is a warm, relaxed, and somewhat veiled sounding headphone. Bass level is slightly but appropriately accentuated and only slightly bleeds into the mids. Bass quality and tightness is fairly good, but is prone to distortion at high levels. Midrange response is nicely even and coherent, but lacks a bit of level in the upper mids decreasing a sense of presence in vocals. Treble is a bit uneven. Loss of response 5-8kHz with subsequent treble coming back to good levels makes cymbals and vocal sibilance sound a bit breathy and without body. Dynamics and imaging are fairly good for a headphone of this type and price. Comparing to the CAL! I found the CAL! a more lively listen coming a bit closer to target in the upper-mids and treble. But it did have a slightly more ragged and plasticy sound relative to the wooden E-Mu Walnut. In comparisons where I switched quickly between the two, I felt I preferred the more lively, neutral sound of the CAL!. But in long listening sessions, I found the CAL! to be more fatiguing and less involving than the more refined sound of the E-Mu Walnut.
The E-Mu Walnut is a lovely little headphone, and folks with a penchant for a warm relaxed sound are likely to be quite pleased. But with the previous, very similar but more neutral sounding, CAL! still available at about half the price, budget conscious folks are probably best steered in this direction. At around $150, I still find the uglier, but more neutral and durable, Audio Technica ATH-M50x the superior buy.
Even though I find it more of a side-grade than an up-grade to the previous CAL!, the E-Mu Walnut is solid headphone at its price for folks that like a relaxed sound, and I've got no problems recommending it as such.
VideoClick here to watch on YouTube. Resources
E-Mu home page and Walnut product .pdf.
Expired Massdrop for E-Mu Walnut.
Threads on Head-Fi.org here.































