Gramophone Dreams #68: Lab12 Mighty power amplifier & Pre1 preamplifier Page 2

When I flipped the Mighty's deck-mounted switches to engage triode operation, the sound with the Falcons became more pure by several notches—and also more color-saturated.

1222granny.Chesky-Berlioz

In UL mode, Chesky Records' first release, Hector Berlioz's Symphonie Fantastique: Opus 14 performed by The Royal Philharmonic conducted by Massimo Freccia, recorded by Kenneth Wilkinson in 1962 for a Reader's Digest box set (LP CR-1), sounded powerful and micro-focused but also grayed and a little brittle.

In triode mode, the Mighty's pentodes made the strings of The Royal Philharmonic glow. I could feel the volume of their massed energy bouncing off the walls of Waltham Forest Town Hall. Sounds that in UL mode had been brittle and bright were now supple and sensuous. Colors came out of hiding. Transparency was a notch down compared to the directly heated triodes, but only a touch. It was a "Bravo! I love orchestra recordings" moment.

Compared to the Elekit TU-8600S
The first amplifier I compared Lab12's Mighty to was Elekit's TU-8600S 300B single-ended ($1880 plus the cost of tubes). The Elekit was using the Linlai Cossor WE300B tubes. The first thing I noticed after the changeover was how much softer, larger, and calmer the energy field had become. With the Linlai 300Bs, bass notes seemed more expansive and more harmonically developed than with the Mighty in either mode. Played through the Elekit with the Linlai tubes, on Julia Wolfe's Soõ Percussion album Forbidden Love (24/96 FLAC, Cantaloupe Music/Qobuz), low-frequency reverb tails were more spacious and much longer. It was not subtle.

In both UL and triode modes, the EL34 Mighty played with crisper, more conspicuously detailed clarity, which distributed charged energy across a well-constructed, shallower sound matrix. With the Mighty, the quantity and aesthetic quality of reverb was always good but sometimes a little short-tailed and never the main attraction. With the Elekit, reverb was the tasty sauce of the main course.

The chief difference between the 300B amp and the EL34 amp was this: The Mighty made my Falcons sound precise, like mastering-lab monitors; the TU-8600S made them sound relaxed, like horn speakers.

The Mighty and the Elekit sounded more alike when I switched from Linlai's "Western Electric Replica" tubes to new-manufacture (2021) Western Electric 300Bs. The Western Electric tubes sharpened the Elekit's focus, added density and clarity, and sparked up all forms of dynamics to something closer to the Mighty in UL mode, which threw punches like a fit middleweight.

I was raised in a German-speaking household by a Teutonic father who played Gustav Mahler and organ music by Bach almost exclusively. My Dad passed decades ago, so sometimes I feel a need for day-long doses of German lieder to remind me how a German voice sounds. When I do this, the first recordings I reach for are songs sung by Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau.

1222granny.Schubert-Fischer-Dieskau

I already knew that the Western Electric–tubed Elekit amplifier preserved Fischer-Dieskau's tone better than any other amp in my herd, so I was revved to see how the Mighty would handle that godlike baritone. I played my Made-in-Germany "tulips" pressing (Deutsche Grammophon LP SLPM 138 117) of Fischer-Dieskau singing Ein Schubert-Gothe-Liederaband, first through the Elekit and then through the Lab12 Mighty in triode mode.

With the Elekit equipped with Western Electric tubes, Fischer-Dieskau's voice came out of the Falcons with gripping volume, power, and old-school German manner. The only thing missing with the 300Bs was the rugged high-relief texture of the baritone's upper registers—and that's exactly what the Lab12 in triode mode delivered, along with a wet, glowing transparency I never thought I'd hear from a pentode.

I don't want to say the Elekit and the triode-wired Mighty sounded alike, but mostly they did. The chief difference was in how the triode-wired Mighty emphasized the immediacy and raw texture of the upper octaves while the Elekit directed my attention to beauties in the baritone's mid and lower octaves.

Yet another bias: I was sure there was zero chance that a triode-connected EL34 could play with as much explicitness as a directly heated power triode. Once again, the Mighty rebuked my preconceptions, reminding me to judge amplifiers slowly by listening to the sounds coming from my speakers and not by the voices in my head. In triode mode, playing Goethe's "An Schwager Kronos," the Mighty showed me the size of the recital hall and rocked my small room literally with 80dB average levels, 94dB peaks, and no signs of clipping or gasping for current.

With Klipsch RP-600M
Another bias-defeating shift occurred when I switched from the relatively compressed BBC sound of my reference Falcons to the wider-open, more fluid and immediate-sounding Klipsch RP-600M speakers.

With the Mighty driving the easy-to-drive Klipsch playing one of the great recordings of all time, Argerich & Ricci: 1961 Leningrad Recital II (16/44.1 FLAC DOREMI/Qobuz), the sound seemed raw, stripped bare of hazy impediments, distinctly more vibrant, there, and uncompressed than it does through my beloved Falcons. These almost-free ($769/pair) bookshelf speakers do not project sound with the same levels of descriptive precision and refined tone as the Falcon Gold Badges, but, on the other hand, the Gold Badges do not wake up the room and approach the listener with as much scintillating energy as the RP-600M. Every time I use these cool-looking Klipschs, I love them more. In the best sense of the expression, Lab12's Mighty amp powering Klipsch's RP-600M speakers was the bleacher-level ticket to the triode-horn experience.

I have long said everything I ever mocked, I've become. It continues to be true. I never imagined a single EL34 wired in triode could satisfy at the same level as a "real" triode—I always assumed that it couldn't—but my experiences with Lab12's Mighty proved that assumption to be wrong. Likewise, I never thought I'd be an apologist for Ultralinear operation, but here I am loving the extraordinary focus and vibrancy of the Mighty in UL mode. The Mighty is an exciting-to-use, paradigm-shifting treat.

Another Lab12 component: the Lab12 Pre1
Besides its timeless, recording-studio look, the first thing I noticed about Lab12's Pre1 preamplifier is that it uses one medium-mu (33) E88CC twin-triode per channel to develop 21dB (!) of gain with no feedback. Typically, line stages deliver 6–12dB of gain. The potential is there: With no feedback and those high-transconductance E88CCs, I should get clarity, microdetail, and high-revving dynamic excitements. And that's what I got.

The Pre1 has five line-level (RCA) inputs and two outputs: one RCA, the other XLR. When I looked at the manual, I noticed that the Pre1's input impedance is specified as 50k ohms, its output impedance as 900 ohms, which means the Pre1 should interface well with most sources and power amplifiers, at least in terms of those basic electrical parameters. It measures 17" × 4.3" × 11.4" and weighs 15.4lb. It costs $2290 and uses solid state rectifiers, generic, hard-rubber footers, and a motorized, made-in-Japan Alps Blue Velvet volume control.

When driving its Mighty stablemate, the Pre1 took all the Mighty's strong points and improved them, emphasizing speed, clarity, detail, and momentum. The Pre1's transparency-sparkle factor was off the charts.

When I switched to the Pre1 from the most invisible preamp I've found, HoloAudio's KTE Serene, I was impressed to notice that the Pre1's clarity/transparency/ invisibility was equal to that of the higher-priced Serene ($3098). That doesn't mean that they sound the same. The main difference listening-wise between the Serene and the Pre1 was in the contrasting, tube-vs-transistor character of their transparencies. The Serene presents recordings with a startling lack of coloration backed by force and urgency. The Pre1 does that, too, but the Pre1's transparency is less stark than the Serene's, breathier and more vibrant with a slight, just-right aura of tube radiance.

1222granny.ss1

The ultimate "Wow!"
When I realized the Pre1 has 21dB of gain, I couldn't wait to pair it with the First Watt F8, a two-stage, single-ended, no-feedback JFET amp that's gain-challenged, making only 15dB.

With the Serene, which makes about 6dB, the F8 was quiet and extremely pure of tone but low on bright-light vividness and jump factor.

The Pre1 fixed those shortcomings. Fed by the Pre1, First Watt's F8 became a full-power dynamo, driving some of that British reserve out of the Gold Badges. Even more than the Serene, the Pre1 sparked the F8 into full animation and all-out peacock-color glory. I never imagined the F8 was capable of that much tight bass or dynamic athleticism. I felt like: This is it! All I'll ever need!

Compared to the PrimaLuna EVO 400
Speaking of "all I'll ever need," I have in the bunker some products that I have reviewed but have not used often enough for comparisons. Most notable among these is PrimaLuna's flagship EVO 400 preamplifier ($4495), which I regard as the most natural, unaffected line-level preamplifier I've used. It is my reference tube preamp.

The EVO 400 is a complete dual-mono design, with two 5AR4 tube rectifiers (one for each channel) and three 12AU7 twin triodes per channel plus five source inputs, two of which are XLR, three RCA, and an output impedance of 256 ohms.

1222granny.ssbac

When I removed Lab12's Pre1 and put the EVO 400 pre in front of the First Watt F8, the sound changed from spring-fed fast-running stream to something denser, more oceanic and enveloping. Compared to the PrimaLuna, the Pre1 sounded turbocharged. Could this be the difference between solid state and tube rectifiers?

Both tube preamps played recordings with more splendor and tactility than the solid state HoloAudio Serene, but neither pre could match the Serene for low-end gut-punch, upper-base detail, or dynamic swagger. I regard all three preamps as sitting at or near the leading edge of what's possible with line-level preamplification.

Pre1 + G Three
I stated in the introduction that Genelec's G Three active speakers were my cleanest window for observing the quality of line-level components; they are also good at exposing noise, fog, and compression in whatever amp-speaker combo they replace.

After the switch from the Pre1–Mighty–Falcon combo to the Pre1–G Three, the first thing I noticed was how the bass was now bigger and more present than it had been with the Falcons and how it rolled off more abruptly. Once my brain got past all that new bass energy, I realized I was experiencing a more refined, grainless, "invisible" preamplifier than any I could recall using.

As I listened to my new favorite composition, "Emotionsea," from my new favorite album, In June by Fama M'boup (24/48 FLAC, o-cetera/Qobuz), it became clear that the Lab12 Pre1 driving the G Threes, sourced by the Denafrips Terminator Plus, was possibly the most vivacious, deliciously see-into, show-me-the-recording sound I've ever heard from my little hi-fi. Treble and voice articulation were the best I've heard from digital. I marveled at how each cut on the same album sounded as different as it was recorded.

If you have a small room and like your recording playback uncolored but colorful, this could be an end-game sound system.

In sum
If you're a tube-favoring audiophile, these Lab12 separates offer pure, high-lucidity sound with just enough tube brilliance and harmonic sheen to keep the sound fascinating and the music human. Highly recommended.

ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Glotz's picture

Thank you!

Great review and the comparisons to your recent review hammers home the importance of the LAB12 gear. I need to audition these for sure! Love to see preconceptions smashed! We're all better for it.

Jonti's picture

You crack me up, Herb. :)

NY State of Mind's picture

Hey Herb,
Great review as always and I love your music selections too!
I can't seem to get the above referenced track to play in MQA using Audirvana, the DAC indicates only regular 16/44.1 on my system.
How did you get this album to play in MQA?
Thanks and keep up the great work!

Herb Reichert's picture

it was no burden — it's on Tidal via Roon

but that song's so good it would knock you down coming out a broken clock radio

h

NY State of Mind's picture

Ah, got it, so the MQA version is only available on Tidal and not Qobuz as mentioned in the piece?

tenorman's picture

Another beautifully written review Herb . Thank you for mentioning the magnificent voice of Fischer Dieskau. In his prime he was surely the greatest interpreter of German Lieder - irreplaceable. Lucky you to be raised in a household that played Mahler, Schubert Lieder etc.

Jack L's picture

Hi

For my design-built Class A SET preamp & power amps, I always use "fixed bias" topology - They sound better musically. No "bias" to me.

That said, not all fixed bias circuitry sound equally superb. I used only certain type of rechargeable batteries (seried-up) for grid biasing of all the triode driver & triode-strapped pentodes in my home-brewed SET.

My ears love the sound of fixed bias with batteries way way over AC -to-DC fixed bias used in most most, if not all, brandname SETs & Push-pull power amps, like the famous vintage Dynaco ST-70 UL PP power amps.

I also used same type rechargeable batteries for fix-biasing my phonostage vintage Telefunken ECC83s - musically superb sounding.

Listening to battery fixed bias is believing

Jack L

Jack L's picture

Hi

Yes, I never liked the sound of my vintage Dynaco ST-70 UL power amps when they were donated to me 2 decades back - totally unacceptable to my ears. It was resurrected from its sonic hell to
2nd heaven after my thorough upgrade including replacing its factory composite electrolytic filter cap in its HV power supply with brandnew AC motor-run oil capacitors.

Pretty musically pleasant with my upgraded ST-70 UL - fast, clean, transparent, detailed & pretty open sounding.

YET, when it now sounds even much better like further raised up to 4th sonic heaven when I converted the EL-34s to triode, triode-UL PP switchable. I always keep it on triode mode which sounds soo much better than its orginal UL mode.

Listening to triode is believing.

Jack L's picture

Hi

I second your above statement, BUT, it is not your bias - it is a sonic fact to discerned ears, including yours truly.

NO, repeat, NO other model tubes can match up the ELEGANT musicality of WE300B, not even 2A3 or the more powerful 211 & the like triodes, period, IMO. EL-34 ? not even remotely close musically, IMO ! This is tube design physics !

Again, I can describe the sonic beauty of WE300B :
"Like a Cinderella spinning in her ballet dancing shoes vs an old bag dragging her feet"

Listening is believing

Jack L

Indydan's picture

Hey Jack L. do you like talking to yourself? Nobody seems to be listening...

Jack L's picture

Hi

No, I am talking to YOU as well as the editors etc, just to name a few. So you listened & just opened your big mouth to respond, right?

Jack L

Indydan's picture

Big mouth, me? Really? I am not the one who litters these articles with nonsense posts all day long.

You seem to think you have a special relationship with the editors. That is both funny and sad...

Keep it up Jackie Poo!

Jack L's picture

Hi

Really? Show me which are the posts "nonsense posts all day long" ????
YOU, BIGmouth SourGrape !!!!!!!!

I challenge YOU hereby to post something decent here instead of shooting in the dark, SourGrape !

YOU BIGMOUTH is soooo naive to think the editors here have chosen to turn a blind eye to my posts ???? Use your head, kid !

Don't YOU litter the space here again with your utter nonsense !

Jack L

Indydan's picture

Hey Jackie poo, relax or you will wet your panties.

Glotz's picture

The moral of the story is Herb challenged his biases and found that LAB12 gear not only broke those biases, but provided new benchmarks in his listening experiences. That was important to him- and me.

It reminds us that our new auditions of gear should be done with open-minds, not old convictions of what is 'best'.

Things have changed!

Jack L's picture

Hi

I indeed agree to the "moral of the story" of Herb you just mentioned. Honestly, you know him much better than I know him.

But LIVE perfomrance I always use as the yardstick of gauging home audio has NEVER 'changed' for me at least.

Jack L

Glotz's picture

I do value your deep knowledge, Jack.

Thank you.

Jack L's picture

Hi

Thanks. Your profound humanity insight serves heartfelt complement to me.

Honestly, being an engineering guy with true intention to help out whoever not so fluent in audio, I know I might have overdone it by offending whoever unconciously. A rough diamond I might be ?!!

I hereby offer my sincere apology to whoever I have offended !

I wish we did not have to fight bitterly before arriving some mutual understanding just now.

Please feel free to ask me anything about audio to hopefully improve your music enjoyment. I am all eyes & ears for your goodself.

Keep up your great humanity insight ! Frankly, this is my weakness.

Jack L

Glotz's picture

And many blessings to you, Jack.

Jack L's picture

Hi Glotz

May God bless your goodself & your family folks in many years to come !

Yours truly Jack

Jack L's picture

Hi

What can be more "natural & unaffected line level preamp" than no line preamp ??

We got to know what harmonic-rich music likes & dislikes ! It dislikes fighting its way through electronics to reach its destination.

That's why live acoustical music is so emjoyable to music lovers. Music goes straight to our ears !!!

So to spend $2,300 or even up to $4,500 for a "most natural & UNaffected" tube line preamp ? Just for a volume control with undue harmonic, intermodulation & phase distortions & noise as bonus ??

Yes, I am a cheapskate who would never spend a penny for redundancy. Yet I've spent big bucks in high fashions for my wife & my quality lifestyle.

Like it or not, any line level ACTIVE preamp is an absolute redundancy, IMO.

The myth of acquiring an active line leveo preamp is to ensure the power amps pumping out enough power to drive the loudspeakers !

Again, any programme sources, like CD/DVD players, DAC, etc digital media, phono preamps, tape deck, tuner & the like analogue media already provide adequate output voltage/current for any power amps to deliver their rated maximum power. So should we still need/want to spend big bucks to aquire an active line level preamp ????

A PASSIVE line level "preamp" with volume control/input selector is what we neeed which is musically & technically "most natural & unaffected" device for much much much less money !

Money bring happiness, musically ?

Let me kill the myth of the need of an active line level preamp.

I just did a sound pressure level measurement with my digial sound level meter set up at my ears level at my sweet audition spot which is 11ft from each of my front loudspeaker front panel.

Music source: Tchaikovsky Piano Concerto No. 1 from one of my reference CD (2006 recoreding). My no-name DVD player hooked up to my no-name DAC (24bit192KHz) then to my line input of my home-brewed phono-line preamp, with passive direct bypass mode on. It means my DAC drives virtually direct my home-brewed 5W+5W tube SET.

The performance was (is always) enjoyable. With the volume control set only at 12 o'clock midway (50%), From solo instrument measured below 50dBC (max & fast response) to sky-is-the-limit climax (being passive) 90dBC. I can hear the micro details of the pianist's fingers hitting the keyboard & the rich harmonic decay of the foot pedal. So entire performance was so OPEN & AIRY & spatial abundant.

Please tell me your nusical experience of any ACTIVE line premps, price irrespective that bring you back soooo close to the original performance enjoyment.

Listening is believing

Jack L

Jack L's picture

Hi

YES, star-groundings should be used for audio amps as a matter of course for nowadays grid power vs old timer audio installation with multi-point groundings decades back.

The question is: how & where to plant an effective "one point" grounding to the metal enclosure chasis ?

An effective single-point grounding device, comprising solidstate rectifiers, UHV capacitor & resistor, enchored at one specific point of the amp metal enclosure chasis serves 3 crucial functions:

(1) to reduce circulating ground loop currents to minimize 50/60Hz hum noise induced to the audio amps.

(2) to drain away RFI/EMI noises emitted from surrounding digital gears. WiFi & home electrical appliances.

(3) to provide a free flow of large FAULT currents away from the audio circuitry installation to external safty grid earth via the metal chasis.

The (3) function is crucial to prevent electrocution in case of major HV short circuits or meltdown due to, say, power transformation failure or power tubes meltdown etc etc. FYI, 300B is pretty 'meltown" vulnerable !

Safty first, I always installed effective on-chasis one-point grounding device to handle the above 3 electrical issues for my amps installations.

The crucial question: any brandname amplifiers ever got such life-saving grounding devices installed ???? I am not sure any audio designers know enough electricity faults to prevent it from occurring in their amps ??????

Otherwise, Good luck audio consumers !

Jack L

Rothwea's picture

An insightful review Herb. I've recently auditioned three Lab 12 components and all of them contradicted my preconceptions and sounded better than I thought they should.

PECwines's picture

I just ordered the Pre1. I had read other reviews, all positive, but this one sealed the deal. If Herb “anoints” it, I figure it’s good. I am currently using an Atoll IN100 SE and while it is very good, especially for the money, I am lacking a bit of sweetness and holographic imaging that I get with my DECware Zen in another system. Of course, the Atoll gives me more power and low end “punch”. I am hoping the Pre1, connected to the Atoll bypass input, will give me the “fix” I desire.

There’s no dealer local to me, so I haven’t been able to have a demo or in-home evaluation, but I am pretty sure I will be happy. In the rare chance I’m not, I’ll sell it on and take the loss.

X