Gryphon Apex Stereo power amplifier Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

Because the Gryphon Apex Stereo is big and heavy, I drove to Michael Fremer's place in deepest, darkest New Jersey with my Audio Precision SYS2722 system, digital and analog oscilloscopes, and test loads. I preconditioned the amplifier by operating it at 1/8 the specified power into 8 ohms for 20 minutes. At the end of that time, the temperature of the heatsinks was 113.6°F/45.4°C and that of the top panel 105.3°F/40.8°C. The bias was set at High for all testing.

The Gryphon Apex Stereo has only balanced inputs. The voltage gain at 1kHz was 30.85dB into 8 ohms, very close to the specified gain of 31dB. The amplifier preserved absolute polarity, ie, was noninverting. The input impedance is specified as 20k ohms. I measured 19.9k ohms at low and middle frequencies, decreasing inconsequentially to 19.5k ohms at the top of the audioband.

Gryphon specifies the Apex's output impedance as 0.015 ohms. My measurement was slightly higher in the right channel, at close to 0.05 ohms (including the series resistance of 6' of speaker cable), and significantly higher in the left channel, at 0.17 ohms. I checked the wiring and connections and found nothing amiss. I am at a loss, therefore, to explain this discrepancy. The variation in the small-signal frequency response of the Apex's right channel into our standard simulated loudspeaker (fig.1, gray trace) was inconsequential. Into resistive loads (blue, red, cyan, magenta, and green traces), the amplifier gently rolled off well above the audioband, with the –3dB frequency dependent on the load and channel. The left channel's response into 2 ohms (green trace) was down by 3dB at 130kHz. The Apex's reproduction of a 10kHz squarewave into 8 ohms (fig.2) featured very short risetimes and no overshoot or ringing.

822gry.GrApexfig01

Fig.1 Gryphon Apex, frequency response at 2.83V into: simulated loudspeaker load (gray), 8 ohms (left channel blue, right red), 4 ohms (left cyan, right magenta), and 2 ohms (green) (1dB/vertical div.).

822gry.GrApexfig02

Fig.2 Gryphon Apex, small-signal 10kHz squarewave into 8 ohms.

As expected from its dual-mono construction, the Apex's channel separation (not shown) was superb, at >100dB in both directions below 2kHz and still 80dB at the top of the audioband. The unweighted, wideband signal/noise ratio (ref. 1W into 8 ohms and measured with the balanced input shorted to ground) was very good, measuring 73.4dB (average of the two channels). This ratio improved to an excellent 85dB when the measurement bandwidth was restricted to 22Hz–22kHz, and to 90.6dB, left, and 94.1dB, right, when A-weighted. Spectral analysis of the low-frequency noisefloor while the Gryphon Apex Stereo drove a 1kHz tone at 1Wpc into 8 ohms (fig.3) revealed that although some AC-related spuriae were present, these all lay at or below –100dB in the left channel (blue trace) and –110dB in the right channel (red trace). The Apex has individual AC power cords for its two channels. To avoid a ground loop, I plugged my test equipment into the same wall outlet as the left channel. However, I don't believe this was the reason for the higher level of noise and spuriae in the left channel, as the spectrum was the same whether I grounded the XLR input's pin 1 or left it floating. In any case, though higher than in the left channel, the level is still very low.

822gry.GrApexfig03

Fig.3 Gryphon Apex, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 1W into 8 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

The Gryphon Apex Stereo's maximum continuous power with both channels driven is specified as 210Wpc into 8 ohms (23.2dBW), 420Wpc into 4 ohms (23.2dBW), and 800Wpc into 2 ohms (23dBW). The Gryphon amplifier exceeded its specified powers into the higher impedances. With our usual definition of clipping as being when the THD+noise reaches 1%, I measured a clipping power with both channels driven of 240Wpc into 8 ohms (23.8dBW, fig.4) and 450Wpc into 4 ohms (23.5dBW, fig.5). With one channel driven, the Apex clipped at 750W into 2 ohms (22.7dBW, fig.6), even though the wall voltage had only dropped slightly at that power, from 120.1V to 119.5V.

822gry.GrApexfig04

Fig.4 Gryphon Apex, left channel, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 8 ohms.

822gry.GrApexfig05

Fig.5 Gryphon Apex, left channel, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 4 ohms.

822gry.GrApexfig06

Fig.6 Gryphon Apex, left channel, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 2 ohms.

Figs.4, 5, and 6 were taken from the left channel's output. Fig.7 shows how the percentage of THD+noise varies with frequency into 8, 4, and 2 ohms at 20V (equivalent to 50W into 8 ohms, 100W into 4 ohms, and 200W into 2 ohms). The THD+N was significantly lower in the right channel (red, magenta, and gray traces) than the left (blue, cyan, and green traces), though still low into the higher impedances.

822gry.GrApexfig07

Fig.7 Gryphon Apex, THD+N (%) vs frequency at 20V into: 8 ohms (left channel blue, right red), 4 ohms (left cyan, right magenta), and 2 ohms (left green, right gray).

The left channel's distortion signature into 8 ohms predominantly comprised the second and third harmonics (fig.8). Spectral analysis at the same power (fig.9) revealed that while the third harmonic lay at similar levels in both channels, the second harmonic was 16dB higher in the left channel (blue trace) than the right (red), lying at –73dB compared with –89dB. Even with the left channel's higher level of harmonic distortion than the right, the Apex still did well driving an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones at 100Wpc into 4 ohms (fig.10). The 1kHz difference product lay 83dB (left) and 87dB (right) below the peak signal level, and while the higher-order products at 18 and 21kHz were a little higher in both channels, they still lay at or below –72dB.

822gry.GrApexfig08

Fig.8 Gryphon Apex, left channel, 1kHz waveform at 50W into 8 ohms, 0.0278% THD+N (top); distortion and noise waveform with fundamental notched out (bottom, not to scale).

822gry.GrApexfig09

Fig.9 Gryphon Apex, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 50Wpc into 8 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

822gry.GrApexfig10

Fig.10 Gryphon Apex, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at 100Wpc peak into 4 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

Presumably, the left channel's higher levels of distortion and noise and its higher output impedance than the right channel's are sample-specific. But even so, the Gryphon Apex Stereo offers high power coupled with a wide bandwidth and primarily low levels of low-order distortion. I wish I could have stayed longer at Mikey's to listen to it driving his Wilson Chronosonic XVX speakers, but I had to beat the rush-hour traffic back to Brooklyn.—John Atkinson

COMPANY INFO
Gryphon Audio Designs ApS
US distributor: Gryphon Audio N.A.
anthony@gryphon-audio.dk
(201) 690-9006
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Anton's picture

Similar to Mike's burning ampnesia....

When I was 20, the cassette deck in my car seized up and would not release the tape I was playing. My budget was too tight for a new deck, so I simply listened to that darned tape over and over and over and over for an entire year. I don't remember which tape it was.

Scott Strother's picture

Gryphon should be justly proud. I don't think I'd ever leave the house, listening to that masterpiece.
It's colossal!

georgehifi's picture

Gotta love a real amp (linear) that can do current into low impedance, and probably 1ohm as well if the test gear could take it. By doubling it's wattage for each halving of load impedance.❤️
And that can do real square wave testing (without AP class-D filters) to show the real thing, and not a imaginary pictures like the ones presented of Class-D amps square waves.

Cheers George

windansea's picture

Reading Mr. Atkinson's measurements, this beastly amp does not seem to double down from 8 to 4 to 2. Not like the Krells were famous for. Kinda weird, it's gigantic, cost no object, yet fails the ol' "double down" test.

oldslat88's picture

Sorry to see you go. Looking forward to following you at Tracking Angle.

MhtLion's picture

Michael, I’m very saddened to hear that this is your final review on stereophile. Please note you are my favorite reviewer of all time. Wish you well on everything!

volvic's picture

This beast could easily drive both my Linn Kans I & II…overkill??? You betcha!!! Damn the torpedoes!!!! What a terrific read. Godspeed Mickey, see you on the other side.

sw23's picture

I'm sure it sounds glorious. But why cram all those goodies into one box? Is there some advantage I'm unaware of?

supamark's picture

They also make a mono version, the Apex Mono for those with more room. Personally, I have room for neither :(

Mark Phillips,
Contributor, Soundstage! Network

Glotz's picture

I really wished they had this amp for audition at AXPONA this year... sigh.

Great review cutting to the truth of the sound and I am going to miss the crap out of Mikey in these pages.

Finally got to meet Mikey this year as well! He was funny and nice like always. I was too stoned.. lol. Gonna miss him but Stereophile will only get better and so will TAS.

Happy 60th Stereophile!!!

Glotz's picture

A hundred bucks more? Been thinking about Class A tube equipment recently.. I also wonder about the the additonal heat in summer.. lol.

Herb Reichert's picture

according to the specs the Apex consumes only 0.5W at idle

if that is true you will only pay to play . . . think quarter coins not c-notes

hr

Anton's picture

I wonder which power cords they supply with it?

Glotz's picture

Thanks Herb!

supamark's picture

Sad to see you move on from Stereophile/Analog Planet, your turntable reviews are aces - I bought my Rega P10 based largely on your review, you perfectly described the sound.

Your experience with the Apex mirrors that of my editor at Soundstage! He said it stomped a mud-hole in his Boulder 2060 (a very good amp itself) with Vivid Giya G1 speakers. That's two very different speakers, made by designers with very different design goals, with which this amp kicks ass. I think we have a new contender in the SotA for amps. Time to head down to the local dealer and spend some time with a Gryphon amp.

I had to google the founder to make sure he wasn't the same Flemming Rasmussen that produced/mixed Metallica's "...and Justice for All" (he isn't, hence the "E.") but that would have been funny (both strange and ha-ha).

Mark Phillips,
Contributor, Soundstage! Network.

michelesurdi's picture

i wonder,would two hundred thousand bucks get you the same measurements in both channels?

tabs's picture

If one thing makes me sick to my stomach about the old guard it’s that Stereophole keeps making excuses for “sample deviation” and such when the highest of high end stuff doesn’t measure well. These people are charging one hundred thousand dollars per unit, and you are letting them off the hook for not delivering on basic quality control? What are regular customers supposed to expect if Gryphon can’t be bothered to provide a solid test unit to Stereophile? What does that say about their respect for Stereophile in the first place? Or their customers?

Stereophile played the same game with D’Agostino amps not too long ago that came in subpar with all sort of problems. It’s embarrassing and everything anyone needs to know about where their interests lie.

Maybe the simplest answer to all these problems at the high end is quite simple. It’s that the likes of D’Agostino and Gryphon are trading on brand and image and not on any discernible engineering advantage, and that their customers don’t really care as long as it projects the right message or has the right look.

ChrisS's picture

...crash.

David Harper's picture

yes but a good argument can be made that at least the Lambo is, objectively, worth it's price. A stereo amp, not so much.

ChrisS's picture

...and counting...

Or any item in a 99cent store.

Anton's picture

I grew up in Reno, NV. We had a local Ferrari dealership owned by Bill Harrah of Harrah's casinos and car collection.

Harrah's dealership was the biggest in the world at the time, and I couldn't see why a place like Reno had such a big deal dealership. Ferraris were thick on the road in our area. We even had a Ferrari festival and annual hill climb.

I later found out that that dealership worked with his auto collection restoration department and every new Ferrari that came in had the body panels properly aligned, the stitching brought to uniform quality, the paint finish finished, etc.

His dealership prepared the cars he sold so the new owners would have what they thought they should have buying a car like that.

Maybe ultra high end audio offers a niche for buyers where a new owner could have his 100,000 dollar amp drop shipped to a "finisher" like Harrah's used to be, and the buyer, for a small additional fee (20%) would know that his new toy was performing as promised. Otherwise, how do consumers know they are getting what they purchased?

I think this could make some coin.

The prep service could even offer to make sure the units get paired with the optimal power cords, for an additional fee and purchase, of course.

I'm too old, but one of you young folks should totally do this!

ok's picture

..like Burmester (and Kondo I think) provide indivindual measurements for every single component they make. For that kind of money they should all do the same I suppose along with a 10-year guarantee.

Jack L's picture

Hi.

Agreed for gears at such hefty pricing levels.

But different bench test methods may yield not-identical data.

To measure the output power of a power amp, the dummy loads alone, can be different from the different amp manufacturers, & from different labs. Many use only a hi-power resistor as the dummy load.
Quick & easy, but it is totally different from the realworld situation: loudspeaker system !!!!

The power data thus measured is only theoretically ideal condition which do not reflect the actual output power performance when driving loudspeakers which got some complex LCR AC network, not pure resistance at all.

For Stereophile lab, a simulated loudspeaker load built up of LCR
network is used to used to measure the output power of any integrated/power amp under review. This is therefore much closer to the realworld situation an amp is loading. Therefore much more reliable performance data we can read.

Such similulated loudspeaker load already exposed the harmonic distortion vs outpower power 'weakness' of this 10-grander Danish made power amp at 4/2-ohm loads !

So "individual measurements for every single component" is helpful but not any all-cure remedy for its realworld performance.

Listening is believing

Jack L

ok's picture

..but my concern was more about quality control. This is an extraordinary amplifier no doubt, but something inside the right channel is probably broken, something that can most likely be easily fixed and individual measurements would certainly let show. In fact I think this is the main purpose of audio measurements in general and not a mine-is-bigger competition.

Anton's picture

More of a check to make sure it isn't broken!

Jack L's picture

Hi

For so expensive amps as such will surely be hand-built individually on a bench per order, instead of on a production line like parts, e.g. resistors & capacitors. The component once completely built will surely be bench tested to ensure fully functioning & complying the design specs before shipment to the dealership depots.

Heavy components, like this 500-pounder, are much more vulnerable to damage during transit from the manufacturers overseas to local dealership depots & then to customers' homes.

Good luck to the enduser customers !

Jack L

Anton's picture

When did it break and who broke it.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

AnalogueFan's picture

The analysis would have been fairer if two Gryphon monoblocks had replaced two dartZeel monoblock.
However.
Excellent Review!

X