Technics Grand Class SL-1200/1210GR2 record player Associated Equipment

Sidebar 2: Associated Equipment

Analog sources: Thorens TD 124 MKII turntable; The Wand tonearm; Dynavector DV-10X5 MKII, EMT TDS 15N, Kuzma CAR-30, and Luxman LMC5 cartridges.
Preamplifiers: Aurorasound Vida MKII phono, Manley Chinook phono, Tavish Audio Design Adagio phono.
Integrated amplifiers: PrimaLuna EVO 400, Triode Lab EVO 45.
Loudspeakers: Devore Fidelity O/baby, Heretic AD614, Volti Audio Razz.
Cables: Interconnects: AudioQuest Pegasus RCA, Analysis Plus Silver Apex RCA, Triode Wire Labs Spirit II. Speaker: AudioQuest Robin Hood. AC: AudioQuest NRG Z, Triode Wire Labs Obsession NCF.
Accessories: Pro-Ject VC-S2 ALU Record Cleaning Machine, Hunt Mark 6 Carbon Fiber Record Cleaning Brush, AudioQuest PQ-707 Power Conditioner, IsoTek EVO3 Aquarius Mains Conditioner, Salamander five-tier Archetype rack (2), IKEA Aptitlig bamboo chopping boards (under turntable, preamp, power and integrated amps), mahogany blocks (three to a stack) under IKEA boards.—Ken Micallef

COMPANY INFO
Panasonic Corp. of North America
Two Riverfront Plaza
Newark
NJ 07102
(201) 348-7000
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Glotz's picture

Though I do question your integrity when it comes to your claimed afro-haircut of the 1908's. I am sorry, but we will need to see this famed hairstyle, in a pic, on these pages, very shortly.

Technics really has come back with a vengeance! That SL1200G looks more attractive every day.

jimtavegia's picture

Love the table as I did not care about the variable speed and strobe. Using my Shure test LPs with 1khz and 10khz frequency bands I can tell you that the FFT display in my DAW of those forms are a sharp vertical spike with nearly no spreading at the base. Piano notes are dead on.

For the $1100 it is a great buy for me. Uisng a Shure M97 with a Jico stylus and have also used by AT-VM95 with the ML stylus, but the Shure 97 tracks all the CM/Sec bands on the LP.

moniker's picture

You gotta be joking. What a Laugh Riot.

Anton's picture

Direct drive, idler wheel, belt....do we care about the type of drive, or the result?

moniker's picture

I could care less. Listen to an idler drive, even a DUAL 1019. The proof is in the sound. The most simple solution is always the best. Unless you are dead or deaf.

Glotz's picture

Technology has come a long way in the last 50 years. Idler wheels have their own sets of virtues, where as direct drive and belts... yeah different virtues. Not even getting into carts, arms and stages. It's all good.

JohnnyThunder2.0's picture

the opinionated smug trolling d-ck in the comments section. I hope your stay here is a short one.

Glotz's picture

I would've appreciated a bit of explanation on why all other drive systems suck.

Anton's picture

Hand crank inertia drive is really the only way to go in order to avoid all these electrical motor issues, no matter how 'drive meets platter!'

I bet he has plenty of one arm horsepower for his hand crank.

Glotz's picture

Still laughing... Thanks Anton, you made my Saturday (outside of listening to Laurie Anderson)!

Indydan's picture

Is the proper expression.

moniker's picture

That’s a double negative. He eats shoots and leaves. And which Ivy League school did YOU attend? Marcello, I’m so bored. La spaghetti sono scotti. I’m outta here. All youze can stick it.

JohnnyThunder2.0's picture

the proper phrase is "couldn't care less" but "could care less" is used often enough that is sometimes permissible. But we want to know if the stick up your a-s is a congenital condition or was it developed over time because of some sustained audiophile wrongs. So see you pal. It wasn't nice knowing you.

Anton's picture

Not a double negative, either.

When we join this forum, is there a line for your posting name that says, "Type 'moniker' here?"

DJ FIX's picture

You mention the 1200 has a "direct drive motor with high torque". I realize this is an often repeated belief, but the motor is actually not high torque. That is part of why it works like it does. If it were high torque, there would be weird stability issues as the motor would always be over correcting itself. The "just high enough" torque allows the platter to spin up pretty quickly indeed, but then is weak enough to not interfere with its own flywheel effect. Source: I work on these things daily.

Ortofan's picture

... if you play "78 rpm" discs that were recorded at different speeds.

Also, if KM still has the Technics deck, try it with a Denon DL-103R cartridge.

X