Wilson Audio Specialties Sasha V loudspeaker Page 2

First order of business was swapping out the casters the woofer cabinets had been shipped with and replacing them with the Acoustic Diode footers. First used in the Wilson Alexx V, these footers are conelike pieces assembled from stainless steel and a dollop of Wilson's newer V-material. Daryl Wilson explained to me, "There is coupling, and decoupling, designed into the Acoustic Diodes. Spikes are for coupling, to keep the cabinet from moving front to back, which causes blurring. The V-material is brilliant at decoupling: taking vibration, converting it to heat, ... just for damping."

We hadn't yet finalized the speakers' positions—and moving them is no easy thing with spikes that would punch a hole through the 1/3" thick piece of carpet on my listening room floor. Cue the slider set. These are large, flat, round metal discs offered as an accessory by Wilson that make it possible for very heavy cabinets with spikes to slide around on carpeting.

The pushing and shoving began, moving the Sasha Vs in small and large increments, forward and back, and side to side, in relation to measurements marked on the masking tape—all as Chris subjected himself (and me) to repeated playings of "So Do I" by Irish singer/songwriter Christy Moore, a founding member of Planxty. After each move, Chris sat in the listening chair and made notes, assigning numerical ratings on a form Wilson and its dealers use for this purpose, recording distances from walls and assigning ratings in seven categories: low-bass extension, upper-bass quality, soundstage & center focus, ambient bloom, harmonic balance, sense of dynamics, and flow.

In addition to using his ears and tape measure, Chris used a laser measuring gizmo that, when held up to his ear position (we did not change the position of my listening chair), measured exact distances from the listening position to the wall behind the speakers and from the ear to the drivers. In doing this, we discovered that the wall wasn't perpendicular to the rest of the room! It was off by an inch. This was important to know, in the context of Wilson's time-alignment settings, because if we had used an incorrect measurement from that wall and not compensated for this, the time-alignment effort would have been pointless.

As things shook down, the sweetest spot for the Sasha Vs was about 16" farther toward the front wall—the wall behind the speakers—in relation to where the Sasha DAWs had been sitting, and 4" farther out on toward the sidewalls. Not a small tweak, in other words. I asked Daryl Wilson what might have changed; he commented, "The ability of the system to settle: better damping. The X-material in the woofer is thicker than it was in the Sasha DAW. The ability of the system to start and stop in the woofer region. When the system is more refined and quicker, you can put it closer to the walls. It is more tolerant of boundary issues."

With final placement set, one more important adjustment was needed: leveling the cabinets. A new touch included in the design of the Sasha V is a small bubble level installed on the top of the woofer cabinet, visible with the upper modules in place. We adjusted the Acoustic Diode footers one at a time until the bubble levels were spot on. Why is this important? Because if the speakers aren't level, that throws off the precision of the time-alignment calibrations at the listening spot.

Music for all
I think that a proper review should include listening examples from a variety of musical genres. The first recording I reached for checks the pop genre box: Steely Dan's Gaucho. Spinning my original LP (MCA 6102/37220), "Babylon Sisters" felt like I was being enveloped in a cloud of music, almost a sense of surround, from a stereo pair of speakers. When the chicks first hit the chorus, "Babylon sisters, shake it!," they exploded into the room. Huge width, spectacular dynamics.

In order to carry out some basic A/B comparisons, I had stored the Sasha DAWs on the landing outside my listening room. Now my house was really looking like a hi-fi dealership! I swapped the Sasha DAWs back into the same position and compared. Through the DAWs there was a little less distinction between the Fender Rhodes Don Fagen plays and the electric bass doubling the part, most apparent at the top of the tune. In further listening, I've identified that sorting out musical parts one from another is one of its greatest talents. The DAWs exhibited slightly less sparkle and punch in the vocals than when heard from the Sasha Vs, perhaps a function of the new QuadraMag midrange?

Next major genre: full-scale orchestral classical. I pulled out a recording I think I've seen at every single audio show and dealership: Reiner and the Chicago Symphony doing Stravinsky's Song of the Nightingale and Prokofieff's Lieutenant Kije Lieutenant Kijé (LP, Living Stereo LSC 2150). The Stravinsky, which opens the B-side, sounds scary. First I listened through the Sasha DAWs, then I swapped in the Sasha Vs. That opener was several notches more intense—the shriek Igor intended. After the initial outburst come some real deep drums, reproduced by the Sasha Vs with astounding, physical heft. Then Stravinsky grinds gears, and we hear some delicate, measured tremolo from the strings, floating like a butterfly, stinging like a bee! Lovely, tangible textures. Later in the piece, the almost Coplandesque soft, sustained, jazzy harmonies behind the solo trumpet were to die for.

Are female jazz vocals one genre or two? It was time to stop classroom grading and start appreciating the Sasha Vs on their own merits. A longtime go-to for me and others is Ella Fitzgerald's definitive album Clap Hands, Here Comes Charlie!, from 1961. My LP copy is a fine, 200gm vinyl remaster from the late Classic Records (Verve V6-4053). The standout heartbreaker here has to be "Spring Can Really Hang You Up the Most." Listening to the Sasha Vs, I heard more subtle interplay between the softly mixed piano and the guitar than I've heard before. As for Ella, there was much velvet skin on the bone as she descended step by step from the first to the last statements of the refrain. When she lands on the word "most," she is in alto territory, an E-flat below middle C. Delicious!

Sure, I've got some hard rock. I had preordered the four-LP box set of the freshly remastered Who's Next (Polydor/UMC 35858531). The first LP is the original album, sequenced as it was released. The other three LPs contain a complete live performance by The Who at the San Francisco Civic Auditorium, on December 13, 1971. The live recording allowed me to continue playing my very own version of "Where's Waldo?" I was there for that show, presented by Bill Graham, but I had never heard any of it on record until now. Glyn Johns, who mixed the studio album, was on hand to record the live performance to 16-track tape using the Wally Heider remote truck.

This is not some secondhand mixing board feed; the sound is powerful and clear. There's lots to enjoy here, but I got a particular kick out of "Baba O'Riley," as, instead of that shrill-sounding fiddle on the album, Roger Daltrey takes that part on the harmonica—and he can really blow.

I have told people over the years, and it remains true to this day, that the loudest musical event I have ever heard in my life was The Who at the San Francisco Civic Center. It was simply not possible to be in that auditorium without toilet paper or cotton in your ears; an immense, distortion-free PA flanked an immense Union Jack flag behind the stage. Pete Townsend's unique ability to simultaneously play lead and rhythm guitar was the Full Monty. The Sasha Vs were an ideal vehicle to try to get a sense of the excitement of that; as hard as I cranked them, there was not a whisper of strain or breakup. And I was feeding them a significant fraction of 425Wpc from my McIntosh MC462 stereo amp.

How about some contemporary classical music from an unfamiliar composer? When John Atkinson arrived to do his measurements of the Sasha Vs, it had been less than a week since I was in Hollywood, at EastWest Studios in their large Studio 1. This is the room where Sinatra cut all his 1960s albums for Reprise, when it was known as United Western Recorders. I wrote Little Woodstar scored for vocal quintet and studio orchestra. John Atkinson and Joe Harley are my coproducers. In Studio 1, we recorded a 16-piece group; the vocals will be recorded later in New York. The engineer was Steve Genewick, who for years was Al Schmitt's assistant at Capitol.

Through the Sasha Vs, John and I listened to a temporary mix/edit of the orchestra tracks. With the memory of conducting the session fresh in my ears, the Wilson Sasha Vs created a sensation of one-to-one accuracy, every instrument laid out before me as I recalled it; a soundstage duplicating the true one, uncannily true musical re-creation. That's excellent audio engineering and reproduction.

V for victory
Wilson Audio, perhaps taking a cue from automobile manufacturers, offers the Wilson Audio Certified Authentic program, which provides an opportunity to purchase preowned and demo Wilson loudspeakers that have been thoroughly inspected and refreshed, in the field or, if necessary, at the Wilson factory in Provo, Utah; for details, contact the closest Wilson retailer. It's a great way to get into the Wilson sound for less than the cost of a new pair without trusting to luck with some "dealer" in Malaysia listed on Audiogon. Impressed by the cluster of new tonal qualities the Sasha V brings to the stable, I ended up changing horses, trading my Sasha DAWs in for the new Sasha V.

Are there drawbacks? Horses for courses. If you simply must drive your loudspeakers with watts in the single digits, the Sasha Vs are not right for you: They need juice to sit up and show what they are capable of. Other loudspeakers are more forgiving of bad recordings. These are not omnidirectional—though with the right recordings they can achieve a similar feeling of immersion in the music. There's cost of course, and size and weight: Wilson does offer smaller, lighter models—the Yvette and SabrinaX among floorstanders.

I have read many times about ascending cost curves in high-end audio, offering improvements at the margins, along with descriptions of "diminishing returns." But there's nothing diminishing in the enhancements offered by the Sasha V compared to its predecessor. Far from being marginal, they strike me as substantive and essential, expansive and ambitious. Daryl Wilson and his design and manufacturing team aren't just striving for excellence; they are achieving it in significant steps.

COMPANY INFO
Wilson Audio Specialties
2233 Mountain Vista Ln.
Provo
UT 84606
(801) 377-2233
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
teched58's picture

The way I read Fig.4, the anechoic FR plot, it seems like the Sasha V is -3db on the low end at ~40 Hz.

So this would seem to indicate one needs a subwoofer. Unless I missed it, I don't see any comments in the review from Sasha in re his impressions about the low bass (except for some comments about placement relative to the walls).

funambulistic's picture

The way I am reading the graph, with '0' as the baseline, it appears to be ~+2dB @40Hz, -2dB @30Hz and -5dB @20Hz. Of course, I am all about adding a sub, but it does not look like the Sasha V "needs" it...

georgehifi's picture

To me too, for that kind of money you'd think it would go lower.
BTW nearly all speakers lift a couple dB in the bass before they roll off as in fig 4, but these, fall off a cliff below 50hz, around 10dB down at 25hz, forget Saint Saens Symp No3 Organ

Cheers George

Sasha Matson's picture

Yeah - you missed it - my comment on some Stravinsky: "After the initial outburst come some real deep drums, reproduced by the Sasha Vs with astounding, physical heft."

And note John Atkinson's comment: "the Sasha Vs low-frequency alignment appears to be optimized for definition."
- I love this aspect. I hate phony bumped up bloated bass.
-S.M.

teched58's picture

Thanks for the perspective, Sasha. But you are providing an anecdotal, subjective answer to a quantitative question.

Does "optimized for definition" mean "NOT optimized for FR"?

You seem to be conflating amplitude of the bass with frequency. "Definition" says nothing about how the speaker does with the production of bass below 40 Hz.

Are you saying that the Sasha V can produce bass at lower frequencies than the FR plot indicates?

It seems like you're saying you don't need a subwoofer with this speaker. But you haven't explained why.

Sasha Matson's picture

JA goes on to say:
"...with the low tuning of the port, boundary reinforcement will give extension to 20Hz in a typical room."
- My 'Upstairs System" room is not large; plenty bass for me there.
In a larger more open plan room, yes a sub could be used?
-SM.

teched58's picture

...you've answered the question.

Hand-waving doesn't address the issue. "Plenty of bass" is non-responsive to the question of the FR falling off below ~40 Hz.

What, specifically does "extension to 20 Hz" mean? At what amplitude relative to the baseline FR?

Sasha Matson's picture

- JA does. You need to ask him these type of questions.
John knows my room -and in fact will be with me again next week to measure some new floorstanders from TAD. Same room, same system - but I fully expect a different set of measured figures than for the Sasha Vs.

teched58's picture

...thanks for the response, Sasha.

georgehifi's picture

/

georgehifi's picture

/

teched58's picture

My comment is accurate in re the figure I am referencing. You are referring to Figure 3.

funambulistic's picture

I was referring to Fig. 4, but the 10Hz start point threw me off (counting ain't my strong suite).

RobertSlavin's picture

This is the sort of measured performance that would be good if the speaker cost $1000. The problem is that it costs $50,000. And, yes, measurements do indicate a good deal with speakers.

drduvall's picture

I bought a pair of these speakers almost 3 months ago and couldn't be more pleased. My only concern after auditioning them would be if they had sufficient bass (as compared to the Alexia V's). My plan B was to add a pair of Loki's. After installation my concerns vanished. For my type of music, mostly jazz, the bass is more than adequate. I have played full spectrum sine wave sweeps and detected no dips or brightness. Your results may vary. If I could find $1000 speakers with this level of performance, I'd put the cheapies in every room of the house!

Indydan's picture

Where is Captain Picard doing a facepalm when we need him?

canonken's picture

My local dealer put on an event with these, and we beat them up pretty hard in the large open space in the showroom. A lack of bass was not a concern. Not a fanboy and no skin in the game, but these played very loud and there was a lot of low frequency energy. No sub in the system.

georgehifi's picture

"these played very loud and there was a lot of low frequency energy. No sub in the system."

You miss subs when you turn them off, the scale and grandeur of the soundstage diminish also. I notice also you don't need to play quite as loud when subs are in the system. (my subs are used from 30hz down on GoldenEar Triton-2's )

Cheers George

DougM's picture

I was at that performance by the Who, without earplugs, and it was perfectly tolerable, and far from the loudest Bill Graham produced show I attended. That distinction goes to Neil Young's Rust Never Sleeps at the Cow Palace, always a horrible sounding room, and a show which Neil, in his own words, intended to be "the loudest fucking thing anyone ever heard". The ONLY place there that was tolerable, even with earplugs, was out in the lobby. We were in a set of seats placed behind the stage, with sound from a smaller PA system feeding those seats, and we had to hold our ears closed for the entire show. It was very painful and not fun. I'm sure my tinnitus is from ALL the Bill Graham shows I attended without earplugs at Fillmore West, Winterland, and Berkeley Community, but I have no doubt that that show at the Cow Palace was one of the major contributors. Deep Purple at Winterland, in their tour after the Machine Head album was released, was louder than that show from the Who, (as were other shows I attended at Winterland), and was still tolerable and enjoyable without earplugs. After Rust Never Sleeps, the most unbearable experience I had was Jo Jo Gunne at Winterland, with the guitar player playing slide on a Dan Armstrong Lucite guitar, and dragging the slide up and down the neck without muting unwanted sounds like slide masters Duane Allman, Joe Walsh, and Johnny Winter were adept at, and was extremely painful, hearing those screeches at 110db or louder. That was my second most painful volume experience after the deliberate Neil Young fiasco. Winterland was a very good sounding room, and Bill's sound people were generally very accomplished at providing great sound, in spite of the high volume levels.

DougM's picture

Berkeley Community was a smaller room than Winterland, and was less reflective, and may have had even better sound than Winterland. I saw many great shows there. And, Oakland's arena, what we called the "indoor Coliseum", next to the baseball stadium, and where the Warriors play, is where I saw Zeppelin the first time, just before the third album was released, and we heard Gallows Pole, Since I've Been Loving You, That's the Way, and the rest of the songs from the third album live at that show for the first time. It was very loud, but the sound was flawless, and was the best I've ever heard Zep live, with all videos sounding very flawed and sloppy compared to that show. Shoreline, because of it's sheer size, was far too loud in the seats. The best sound there is at the front of the lawn, where it's not too loud and the sound quality is perfect.

jazzybeyyz's picture

these played very loud and there was a lot of low frequency energy. No sub in the system.
waplus
projectfreetv.onl

X