RadioShack Fires Staff By Email
RadioShack, the second-rate phone store that used to sell electronics, just fired 400 employees by email. Classy, no? But here's my question: Considering that the last five times I tried to buy basic computer supplies at RadioShack (yes, I'm a slow learner, but it is just around the corner), the employees treated me as if I were asking for unobtainium, are the 400 people who've been let go capable of accessing an email account to find out they've been made redundant?
Rail Against the Orthodoxy of Toys
Michael Chabon's rant about the imposition of predetermined boundaries and contours, of a formulary of play—and why Sid in Toy Story wasn't necessarily a Norman Bates in the making.
Random Plot Generator
Since most seven-year-olds can think better than the average evil overlord, maybe evil overlords should hire more seven-year-olds to design their diabolical contraptions. Or they could use this random generator. Hit refresh for a new set of talking points.
Rare Dava Sobel Sighting
The Age profiles Dava Sobel, author of Longitude (very highly recommended), Galileo's Daughter (ditto), and now Planets.
Rat Squirrel Is Not a Bob Weir Band
Nor, it turns out, has it been extinct for 11 million years.
Rational Voters?
Louis Menand's reviewhttp://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2007/07/09/070709crbo_books…; of The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Politics is an interesting read—possibly more interesting than the book itself. However, back in 2004, Gene Weingarten covered the same questions, getting up close and personal with Ted Prus, a non-voter who "just doesn't give a rat's ass."
Rats Are So Meta!
Rats—like people—experience metacognition. To paraphrase Clint Eastwood, a rat's smart enough to know its own limitations.
Ravens and Intelligence
Devising tests that distinguish whether ravens solve problems through logic or instinct ain't easy.
Reactive Cubes
Want one!
Reading Shakespeare Has Effect on Brain
I always knew that (and on the heart, too). What I refuse to believe is that anyone who has actually read Shakespeare could write like this:
"This interdisciplinary work is good for brain science because it offers permanent scripts of the human mind working moment-to-moment. It is good for literature as it illustrates primary human thinking. Through the two disciplines, we may discover new insights into the very motions of the mind."
"This interdisciplinary work is good for brain science because it offers permanent scripts of the human mind working moment-to-moment. It is good for literature as it illustrates primary human thinking. Through the two disciplines, we may discover new insights into the very motions of the mind."