Audio Research I/50 integrated amplifier Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

I performed the measurements of the Audio Research I/50 with my Audio Precision SYS2722 system, concentrating on the behavior of the balanced inputs and the 4 ohm output transformer tap, as that is what I mostly used in my auditioning. The I/50's maximum voltage gain at 1kHz from the 8 ohm output transformer tap into 8 ohms was 19.6dB for the balanced input and 25.6dB for all three single-ended inputs. (The phono module, which is used with the SE1 input, was not installed.) The voltage gains from the 4 ohm tap were 3.2dB lower than from the 8 ohm tap, with both input types. Measured at the headphone jack, the maximum gain was unity for the single-ended inputs, –6dB for the balanced input. Although the balanced input is specified as preserving absolute polarity with the XLR jack's pin 2 hot, the I/50 inverted polarity with this input from the 4 ohm and 8 ohm speaker outputs and the headphone jack. The amplifier did preserve absolute polarity, ie, was noninverting, with the single-ended inputs, again at all three outputs.

The Audio Research's single-ended and balanced input impedances are specified as 48k ohms and 100k ohms, respectively. I measured 37.1k ohms at 20Hz but a low 4400 ohms at 1kHz and 4200 ohms at 20kHz for the single-ended inputs. The balanced input impedance was 52k ohms at low and middle frequencies, 44k ohms at the top of the audioband.


Fig.1 Audio Research I/50, 8 ohm output, frequency response at 2.83V into: simulated loudspeaker load (gray), 8 ohms (left channel blue, right red), 4 ohms (left cyan, right magenta), and 2 ohms (green) (2dB/vertical div.).

The I/50's headphone output impedance was a relatively low 48 ohms from 20Hz to 20kHz, and this output's frequency response was flat from 10Hz to 200kHz. The 4 ohm transformer tap's source impedance at low and middle frequencies was low for a tube amplifier, at 0.61 ohms, but rose to 2.3 ohms at the top of the audioband. As expected, the 8 ohm tap's source impedance was higher, at 0.97 ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz, rising to 5 ohms at 20kHz. Into our standard simulated loudspeaker, the variation in the 8 ohm tap's small-signal frequency response in the audioband, due to the Ohm's law interaction between the amplifier's source impedance and the impedance of the simulated speaker, was +0.9/–1.1dB (fig.1, gray trace). However, the increase in output impedance at the top of the audioband rolled off the output at 20kHz by 2dB into 8 ohms (blue, red traces), by 5.1dB into 4 ohms (cyan, magenta), and by 7dB into 2 ohms (green). The high-frequency rolloff was less severe from the 4 ohm tap, the output at 20kHz lying at –0.5dB into 8 ohms and –2.3dB into 4 ohms, but still –7dB into 2 ohms.


Fig.2 Audio Research I/50, 8 ohm output, small-signal 1kHz squarewave into 8 ohms.


Fig.3 Audio Research I/50, 4 ohm output, small-signal 10kHz squarewave into 8 ohms.

Fig.4 Audio Research I/50, 4 ohm output, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 1W into 8 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

The I/50's channel separation (not shown) was very good in both directions in the midrange, at >80dB, though it decreased to 54dB at 20Hz and 60dB at 20kHz. With the volume control set to the maximum, the unweighted, wideband signal/noise ratio from the 8 ohm tap (ref. 1W into 8 ohms and measured with the single-ended input shorted to ground) was excellent, at 81.6dB (average of the two channels). This ratio improved to 84.7dB, left, and 86.8dB, right, when the measurement bandwidth was restricted to 22Hz–22kHz, and to 100dB in both channels when A-weighted. The S/N ratios from the 4 ohm tap were all 3dB greater, correlating with the 3dB lower gain from this output. Spectral analysis of the low-frequency noisefloor while the Audio Research amplifier drove a 1kHz tone at 1Wpc into 8 ohms (fig.4) revealed that AC-related spuriae were present at 60Hz and its harmonics but were all low in level. This graph was taken with the volume control set to its maximum; the AC spuriae remained at the same level at lower settings of the control, implying that they occurred in the driver and output stages after the volume control.


Fig.5 Audio Research I/50, 8 ohm output, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 8 ohms.


Fig.6 Audio Research I/50, 4 ohm output, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 4 ohms.


Fig.7 Audio Research I/50, 4 ohm output, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 8 ohms.

The I/50's output power is specified as 50Wpc, which is equivalent to 17dBW into 8 ohms and 14dBW into 4 ohms. With our usual definition of clipping as being when the THD+noise reaches 1%, I measured a clipping power of 44Wpc from the 8 ohm tap into 8 ohms (16.43dBW, fig.5) and 42.5Wpc from the 4 ohm tap into 4 ohms (13.26dBW, fig.6). Relaxing the definition of clipping to 3% THD+N meant that the I/50 met its specified maximum power from the 8 ohm tap but was still 0.5dB short of the specified figure from the 4 ohm tap. The THD+N percentage rises in a linear manner with increasing power in figs.5 and 6, which suggests that the circuit uses only a modest amount of loop negative feedback, but the distortion lies below 0.5% at powers below a few watts. The distortion was higher at low powers with the 8 ohm tap driving 4 ohms (not shown) but considerably lower below actual clipping with the 4 ohm tap driving 8 ohms (fig.7).


Fig.8 Audio Research I/50, 4 ohm output, THD+N (%) vs frequency at 6.33V into: 8 ohms (left channel blue, right red), 4 ohms (left green, right gray).

This can be seen in fig.8, which shows how the percentage of THD+noise varies with frequency into 8 ohms (blue and red traces) and 4 ohms (green, gray) at 6.33V (equivalent to 5W into 8 ohms and 10W into 4 ohms). The distortion rose at low and high frequencies into both impedances—the former is probably due to the onset of core saturation in the output transformer; the latter is most likely due to limited open-loop bandwidth, which means that less negative feedback is available in this region.


Fig.9 Audio Research I/50, 8 ohm output, 1kHz waveform at 10W into 8 ohms, 0.517% THD+N (top); distortion and noise waveform with fundamental notched out (bottom, not to scale).


Fig.10 Audio Research I/50, 4 ohm output, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 10Wpc into 8 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).


Fig.11 Audio Research I/50, 4 ohm output, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at 5Wpc peak into 4 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

The distortion harmonic waveform (fig.9, bottom trace) primarily consists of the second harmonic, though spectral analysis (fig.10) indicates that higher-order harmonics are also present, with their levels decreasing as their order increases. With the I/50's 4 ohm tap driving an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones at 5Wpc peak into 8 ohms (fig.11), the 1kHz difference product lay at a fairly high –53dB (0.2%), though the higher-order products at 18 and 21kHz were almost 20dB lower in level.

The Audio Research I/50's measured performance indicates that the amplifier is happiest when it is driving a higher impedance than the nominal values of the output transformer taps. While the distortion signature is primary the subjectively benign second harmonic, the I/50 offers better linearity from its 4 ohm tap.—John Atkinson

COMPANY INFO
AR Tube Audio Corporation (Audio Research)
6655 Wedgwood Rd. North, Suite 115
Maple Grove
MN 55311
(763) 577-9700
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
stereophilereader's picture

Interesting how your findings re - using the 4 ohm taps echo Martin Colloms' conclusions when he tested Quicksilver tube amps in HiFi News back in the 80's.

Expofan's picture

Nice review.

How would this perfrom with a 16 ohm load? Valencias, for example.

georgehifi's picture

Both these GoldenEar (EPDRs of 2.15 ohms at 59Hz and 1.53 ohms at 135Hz), and Kef(EPDRs of 1.66 ohms between 135Hz and 140Hz) speakers were not the best load for a tube amp such as this to be reviewed with, it may have faired a lot better with speakers with easier loads.
Both the GoldenEar and Kef have EPDR impedance loads down below 2ohms in areas where power is needed measured by JA himself.

Cheers George

Glotz's picture

N/T

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Hi George,

The JVS Music Room Enlargement Fund (MREF) is a mere $25,000 short of its goal. It would be great if you would contribute a large chunk of that, plus extra money for the assistants whom I will need to hire monthly to help me move and properly place two sets of speakers.

Thank you so much,
jason

georgehifi's picture

If your a paid reviewer. Then they are tools of the trade, & "retail" tax deductible with the "right receipt". On top of getting them @ cost, not that anyone does that
https://img.freepik.com/premium-vector/angel-emoticon-isolated-white-bac...

Thanks George

texanalog's picture

Does your statement stand in contradistinction to JA's comment that "...neither loudspeaker is a particularly demanding load, with impedances that remain above 6 ohms over much of the audioband,..."?

georgehifi's picture

I understand Stereophile can only use the speakers they have on hand at the time. But maybe it's time to have 2 pairs of resident speakers, easy load, and hard load, to give the readers a bit better indication of how amps really sounds with both loads?

Cheers George

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

I'll be sure to check in with you next time my shoulds list runs low. In the meanwhile, what do you charge for accounting services?

jason

georgehifi's picture

Saying about tradesman and their tools.
Should be, maybe they should just get the right ones.

Cheers George

hollowman's picture

Sorry, this is off-topic, but since this is the most recent entry by JA, I thought it may get prioritized in the "Reply to" email notification system ;)

This query is about JA's Measurements of DACs ... notably:

"Fig.8 DAC brand-model-x spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 0dBFS into 600 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale)."

I've often noted JA refer to this as a "punishing" test and if a d/a unit performs well, it is "bomb proof".

I assume -- correct me if I'm off -- that this is because DAC's output is not "experiencing" its expected high-Z pre-amp load? Hence, it's output stage is forced to drive more current, concomitantly "overloading" that stage a bit. Yes?

Does the output stage exhibit thermal stress (heat, FLIR glow)? Is this a bit like amplifier clipping?

Thanks in advance for JA/anyone's feedback!

georgehifi's picture

"Does the output stage exhibit thermal stress (heat, FLIR glow)? Is this a bit like amplifier clipping?"

Very much so, there are some amps that have stupid low input impedances 1khom-10kohm as yes this taxes some sources output stages./ Gone are the great days when the industry standard input impedance for amps was 47kohm, and tubes were 100kohm and anything could drive them.

Cheers George

hollowman's picture

Note that my query was specifically about JA’s 600 ohm DAC and/or disc or file-player test.
See:
https://www.stereophile.com/content/musical-fidelity-nu-vista-3d-cd-play...

JA may (???) have introduced this test after RH left. Not sure??? Even JA's early digital reviews did not include the 600-ohm test, but it got added in later.
Pre-amps and headphone amps also include similar distortion tests, but not the "low Z" load variety.

MhtLion's picture

Many tube amplifiers I know drives speakers better than what their spec wattage may suggested. However, this particular amp may be opposite? Not sure how to interpret that this amp struggles a bit at the specified impedance terminals. My question is does I/50 exhibit clipping with the moderate load which is normal for many modern speakers?

liguorid42's picture

"I was alarmed to read "Installation of the DAC Module should only be attempted by electronic technicians or other qualified service personnel."

Since the amp chassis contains high voltages, they obviously needed to cover their posterior.

Frankly1's picture

I was very interested in purchasing the amplifier until I found out, balanced inputs beyond 2v are not compatible with the i50. Most every DAC that has a fully balanced design, sounds best from its balanced output and nearly all have normal out voltages over 3volts. The i50 is not even compatible with Audio Research’s own DAC9 if balanced connections are employed. It was likely a design oversight to incorporate balanced inputs on the i50.

X