Audio Research I/50 integrated amplifier Page 2

The midrange was now smooth- and natural-sounding. The imaging was precise on my late-1990s recordings of the Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival, and the soundstage was reproduced with the appropriate depth. This was particularly the case with the KEFs, with which the Audio Research amplifier made a synergistic match. In "Decision Point" from Jerome Harris Quartet's Rendezvous (16/44.1 ALAC file, Stereophile STPH013-2, footnote 3), which I recorded in Chad Kassem's Blue Heaven Studio in Kansas, the pairing made palpable the delicate church acoustic around and behind Billy Drummond's drums.

Harris's Taylor acoustic bass guitar is inherently soft toned, but it sounded slightly more so with the Audio Research amplifier compared with the Parasound Halo JC 1+ monoblocks driven directly by the digital sources with the volume controlled by Roon. Listening to the bass guitar on Ronald Isley's rococo version of "The Look of Love" (16/44.1 ALAC rip from CD, Here I Am, DreamWorks B0001005 02), these solid state amplifiers had a better sense of low-frequency drive, even with the two minimonitors, though it is fair to note that at $18,998/pair, the Parasounds cost more than three times the price of the I/50. It is also fair to note that the less-expensive Audio Research's reproduction of soundstage depth on Rendezvous equaled that produced by the Parasounds.

One thing I noticed with the Isley track was that, with the balanced drive from the MBL processor, I was in danger of running out of gain. (The amplifier's balanced input has 6dB less gain than the single-ended inputs—see the Measurements sidebar.) With the 87.5dB-sensitive GoldenEar speakers and the I/50's volume control set to "41," about 5dB below the maximum, the SPL at my listening chair, measured with the Studio Six app on my iPhone, was 89.4dB(C). In my medium-sized room, the music was sufficiently but not excessively loud. In a room larger than mine or with insensitive loudspeakers, the amplifier may not play loud enough unless used with a single-ended source.

There seemed to be a sweet spot in the amplifier's sound quality. I generally did my critical listening with the average output voltage from the I/50's 4 ohm taps ranging between 2V RMS and 3V RMS. With voltages significantly higher than that, a touch of the midrange glare I had noticed with the 8 ohm taps made an appearance with both the KEFs and the GoldenEars. This was apparent with Steve Nelson's vibraphone on Rendezvous, for example.

Nevertheless, at my usual critical listening levels, Itzhak Perlman, performing the Brahms Violin Concerto in 1976 with Carlo Maria Giulini conducting the Chicago Symphony Orchestra (16/44.1 Warner Classics/Qobuz), was reproduced with an engaging combination of warmth, transparency, and soundstage depth. This recording presents Perlman a little too forward compared with the image of the orchestra (footnote 4), but I can forgive that given the violinist's impeccable intonation. More importantly, the sound of his instrument was sweet-toned and free from glare, even in the bombastic final movement. I was reminded of something Jim Austin wrote about the Audio Research Reference 160S power amplifier in February 2020: "This is the Itzhak Perlman of amplifiers." That would also apply to the I/50, at one-quarter the 160S's price.

I auditioned the I/50's headphone output using my Audeze LCD-X cans. Inserting the headphone cable's plug into the jack on the amplifier's top panel mutes the speaker outputs, though the 6550 tubes remain powered. I had sufficient gain with the volume control set to "41."

In 1998, I recorded the Kalichstein-Laredo-Robinson Trio, augmented by Daniel Phillips on violin and Robert Rinehart on viola, performing Elgar's hauntingly monumental Piano Quintet for a Stereophile CD (Bravo!, STPH 014-2). Listening to the 16/44.1 master files with Roon, the MBL DAC, the I/50, and the Audeze headphones, I was transported back to Santa Fe's St. Francis Auditorium. The sound was full-bodied, perhaps too much so—until I remembered to disable the low-frequency equalization (in Roon) that I had been using for the KEF and GoldenEar speakers. So engaging was the I/50's presentation that, instead of switching among albums, I listened to all 39 minutes of the Elgar, marveling at how the composer gave the viola so many of the tunes. The left-hand register of Kalichstein's piano sounded authoritative even without the benefit of Roon's DSP preset for the LCD-X (footnote 5).

I experienced one bug with the amplifier's control software. Occasionally, the amplifier spontaneously went into standby mode, at least as indicated by the Lexitubes' single dots, while the tubes all remained powered up. This could be some sort of tube-protection feature except that it didn't seem related to playback level; the average voltage the last time it happened was <3V RMS, and it never occurred during high-power measuring on the test bench. Pressing the Power button on the amplifier's top panel, after waiting the requisite 3 minutes, always brought the I/50 back into action.

Conclusion
I enjoyed my time with the Audio Research I/50. It is the perfect amplifier for use in a relatively small room with a high-quality source and speakers, especially if the latter have a fairly high impedance. The I/50 has a touch of that "tube magic" but without going whole hog, as so many of the current crop of tubed amplifiers do


Footnote 3: This CD is out-of-print but the files can be downloaded or streamed from jeromeharris.bandcamp.com/album/rendezvous.

Footnote 4: I used to use a peak-reading digital sound pressure meter I had designed for an article in the October 1981 issue of Hi-Fi News & Record Review to measure the spls at a live classical concerts. In a concerto performance in London's Royal Festival Hall, Perlman's solo violin averaged about 70dB spl at my seat, with orchestral climaxes about 25dB higher.

Footnote 5: See help.roonlabs.com/portal/en/kb/articles/audeze-presets#What_are_Audeze_Presets.

COMPANY INFO
AR Tube Audio Corporation (Audio Research)
6655 Wedgwood Rd. North, Suite 115
Maple Grove
MN 55311
(763) 577-9700
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
stereophilereader's picture

Interesting how your findings re - using the 4 ohm taps echo Martin Colloms' conclusions when he tested Quicksilver tube amps in HiFi News back in the 80's.

Expofan's picture

Nice review.

How would this perfrom with a 16 ohm load? Valencias, for example.

georgehifi's picture

Both these GoldenEar (EPDRs of 2.15 ohms at 59Hz and 1.53 ohms at 135Hz), and Kef(EPDRs of 1.66 ohms between 135Hz and 140Hz) speakers were not the best load for a tube amp such as this to be reviewed with, it may have faired a lot better with speakers with easier loads.
Both the GoldenEar and Kef have EPDR impedance loads down below 2ohms in areas where power is needed measured by JA himself.

Cheers George

Glotz's picture

N/T

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Hi George,

The JVS Music Room Enlargement Fund (MREF) is a mere $25,000 short of its goal. It would be great if you would contribute a large chunk of that, plus extra money for the assistants whom I will need to hire monthly to help me move and properly place two sets of speakers.

Thank you so much,
jason

georgehifi's picture

If your a paid reviewer. Then they are tools of the trade, & "retail" tax deductible with the "right receipt". On top of getting them @ cost, not that anyone does that
https://img.freepik.com/premium-vector/angel-emoticon-isolated-white-bac...

Thanks George

texanalog's picture

Does your statement stand in contradistinction to JA's comment that "...neither loudspeaker is a particularly demanding load, with impedances that remain above 6 ohms over much of the audioband,..."?

georgehifi's picture

I understand Stereophile can only use the speakers they have on hand at the time. But maybe it's time to have 2 pairs of resident speakers, easy load, and hard load, to give the readers a bit better indication of how amps really sounds with both loads?

Cheers George

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

I'll be sure to check in with you next time my shoulds list runs low. In the meanwhile, what do you charge for accounting services?

jason

georgehifi's picture

Saying about tradesman and their tools.
Should be, maybe they should just get the right ones.

Cheers George

hollowman's picture

Sorry, this is off-topic, but since this is the most recent entry by JA, I thought it may get prioritized in the "Reply to" email notification system ;)

This query is about JA's Measurements of DACs ... notably:

"Fig.8 DAC brand-model-x spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 0dBFS into 600 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale)."

I've often noted JA refer to this as a "punishing" test and if a d/a unit performs well, it is "bomb proof".

I assume -- correct me if I'm off -- that this is because DAC's output is not "experiencing" its expected high-Z pre-amp load? Hence, it's output stage is forced to drive more current, concomitantly "overloading" that stage a bit. Yes?

Does the output stage exhibit thermal stress (heat, FLIR glow)? Is this a bit like amplifier clipping?

Thanks in advance for JA/anyone's feedback!

georgehifi's picture

"Does the output stage exhibit thermal stress (heat, FLIR glow)? Is this a bit like amplifier clipping?"

Very much so, there are some amps that have stupid low input impedances 1khom-10kohm as yes this taxes some sources output stages./ Gone are the great days when the industry standard input impedance for amps was 47kohm, and tubes were 100kohm and anything could drive them.

Cheers George

hollowman's picture

Note that my query was specifically about JA’s 600 ohm DAC and/or disc or file-player test.
See:
https://www.stereophile.com/content/musical-fidelity-nu-vista-3d-cd-play...

JA may (???) have introduced this test after RH left. Not sure??? Even JA's early digital reviews did not include the 600-ohm test, but it got added in later.
Pre-amps and headphone amps also include similar distortion tests, but not the "low Z" load variety.

MhtLion's picture

Many tube amplifiers I know drives speakers better than what their spec wattage may suggested. However, this particular amp may be opposite? Not sure how to interpret that this amp struggles a bit at the specified impedance terminals. My question is does I/50 exhibit clipping with the moderate load which is normal for many modern speakers?

liguorid42's picture

"I was alarmed to read "Installation of the DAC Module should only be attempted by electronic technicians or other qualified service personnel."

Since the amp chassis contains high voltages, they obviously needed to cover their posterior.

Frankly1's picture

I was very interested in purchasing the amplifier until I found out, balanced inputs beyond 2v are not compatible with the i50. Most every DAC that has a fully balanced design, sounds best from its balanced output and nearly all have normal out voltages over 3volts. The i50 is not even compatible with Audio Research’s own DAC9 if balanced connections are employed. It was likely a design oversight to incorporate balanced inputs on the i50.

X