Ferrum Wandla D/A preamplifier Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements

I measured the Ferrum Wandla with my Audio Precision SYS2722 system (see the January 2008 "As We See It"). As HR had told me he much preferred the sound with the optional Ferrum HYPSOS power supply, I performed a complete set of measurements using that supply (set to the appropriate 24.0V), then repeated some of the tests with the wall-wart.

Looking first at the Wandla's behavior as a D/A processor, Apple's USB Prober utility identified the Wandla as "Ferrum WANDLA" from "HEM" with the serial number string "12 mb=HEM014964;serce=HEM015368." The USB port operated in the optimal isochronous asynchronous mode, and Apple's AudioMIDI utility revealed that the Wandla accepted 24- and 32-bit integer data sampled at all rates from 44.1kHz to 768kHz. The AES3 and S/PDIF inputs accepted data sampled at rates up to 192kHz. HR had told me that he heard glitches with the Wandla decoding MQA data. I also found this to be the case. Something else I noticed was that while the front-panel display correctly showed the incoming data's sample rate for all rates of 48kHz and above, with 44.1kHz data, it sometimes said "48kHz." Nevertheless, the measured behavior with 44.1kHz data was correct.

With the Digital Input Trim set to "0dB," the Wandla's maximum output level at 1kHz with the balanced outputs feeding a high 100k ohm load was 10.3V. The Trim control operated in accurate 1dB steps down to the minimum setting of "–12dB." As usual, the maximum level from the unbalanced outputs was half those from the balanced outputs. The Wandla preserved absolute polarity (ie, was noninverting) from both output types. The balanced output impedance was the specified 44 ohms at all audio frequencies; the unbalanced output impedance was the specified 22 ohms.


Fig.1 Ferrum Wandla, HQ Gauss filter, impulse response (one sample at 0dBFS, 44.1kHz sampling, 4ms time window).


Fig.2 Ferrum Wandla, ESS Min-Ph filter, impulse response (one sample at 0dBFS, 44.1kHz sampling, 4ms time window).

The Wandla offers a choice of five upsampling reconstruction filters: two from the creator of HQ Player, called HQ Gauss and HQ Apod., and three included in the ESS Sabre ES9038PRO DAC chip, called ESS Lin-Ph., ESS Min-Ph., and ESS Apod. Fig.1 shows the Wandla's impulse response with the HQ Gauss filter and 44.1kHz data. It is typical of a conventional linear-phase filter, with symmetrical ringing before and after the single full-scale sample. The impulse responses of the HQ Apod., ESS Lin-Ph., and ESS Apod. filters were identical to that of the HQ Gauss filter. The odd man out was the ESS Min-Ph. filter, which had a typical minimum-phase impulse response, with all the ringing following the single high sample (fig.2).


Fig.3 Ferrum Wandla, HQ Gauss filter, wideband spectrum of white noise at –4dBFS (left channel red, right magenta) and 19.1kHz tone at 0dBFS (left blue, right cyan) into 100k ohms with data sampled at 44.1kHz (20dB/vertical div.).


Fig.4 Ferrum Wandla, ESS Lin-Ph filter, wideband spectrum of white noise at –4dBFS (left channel red, right magenta) and 19.1kHz tone at 0dBFS (left blue, right cyan) into 100k ohms with data sampled at 44.1kHz (20dB/vertical div.).

The magenta and red traces in fig.3 show the HQ Gauss filter's ultrasonic rolloff with data sampled at 44.1kHz. (The HQ Apod. filter's behavior was identical.) They reach full stop-band attenuation at just below half the sample rate (this indicated by the vertical green line), with complete suppression of the aliased image at 25kHz of a full-scale tone at 19.1kHz (cyan, blue). The harmonics associated with the 19.1kHz tone all lie at or below –108dB. These harmonics are a little higher in level with the three ESS filters (fig.4). Other than the ESS Apod. filter, full stop-band attenuation is reached at 24kHz, with the aliased image at 25kHz suppressed by 90dB.


Fig.5 Ferrum Wandla, HQ Gauss filter, frequency response at –12dBFS into 100k ohms with data sampled at: 44.1kHz (left channel green, right gray), 96kHz (left cyan, right magenta), and 192kHz (left blue, right red) (1dB/vertical div.).


Fig.6 Ferrum Wandla, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 0dBFS with Hypsos supply, volume control set to the maximum and gain trim set to "0dB" (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

Fig.5 shows the HQ Gauss filter's frequency response with data sampled at 44.1, 96, and 192kHz. With 44.1kHz and 96kHz data, the output rolls off sharply just below half the sample rate. With 192kHz data, the response continues the initial gentle rolloff below 40kHz with 96kHz data, then rolls off quickly above 80kHz. Channel separation was superb, at >120dB in both directions below 3kHz, decreasing to a still superb 114dB at 20kHz. The Wandla's noisefloor with the HYPSOS (fig.6) was free from AC supply–related spuriae, but there are low-level sidebands visible around the spectral spike that represents a full-scale 1kHz tone at 2V into 100k ohms. These appear to be spaced at 35Hz, and they were also present when I repeated this analysis with the Wandla powered by the wall-wart supply. The random noisefloor is low with the HYPSOS supply but 6dB lower with the wall wart.


Fig.7 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, 1kHz output level vs 24-bit data level in dBFS (blue, 20dB/vertical div.); linearity error (red, 1dB/vertical div.).


Fig.8 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, spectrum with noise and spuriae of dithered 1kHz tone at –90dBFS with: 16-bit data (left channel cyan, right magenta), 24-bit data (left blue, right red) (20dB/vertical div.).

The red trace in fig.7 plots the error in the Ferrum's analog output level as a 24-bit, 1kHz digital tone stepped down from 0dBFS to –140dBFS. The error is <1dB down to –136dB, which implies very high resolution. An increase in bit depth from 16 to 24, with dithered data representing a 1kHz tone at –90dBFS, dropped the Wandla's noisefloor by 27dB (fig.8). This implies a resolution between 20 and 21 bits, which is up there with the best-measuring processors.


Fig.9 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, waveform of undithered 1kHz sinewave at –90.31dBFS, 16-bit data (left channel blue, right red).


Fig.10 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, waveform of undithered 1kHz sinewave at –90.31dBFS, 24-bit data (left channel blue, right red).

When I played undithered data representing a tone at exactly –90.31dBFS, the waveform was symmetrical, with negligible DC offset, and the three DC voltage levels described by the data were free from noise (fig.9). With undithered 24-bit data (fig.10), the Wandla output a clean sinewave, even at this very low signal level.


Fig.11 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, 24-bit data, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 0dBFS into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).


Fig.12 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, 24-bit data, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 0dBFS into 600 ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

The Wandla produced very low levels of harmonic distortion with full-scale digital data into the high 100k ohm load (fig.11). The third harmonic was the only harmonic visible above the noisefloor; it lay at just –120dB (0.0001%). While the level of the third harmonic rose to –91dB (0.003%) when I reduced the load impedance to the punishing 600 ohms (fig.12), the third and higher harmonics were at or below –100dB.


Fig.13 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, HQ Gauss filter, 24-bit data, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at –3dBFS into 300 ohms, 44.1kHz data (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).


Fig.14 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, ESS Apod filter, 24-bit data, HF intermodulation spectrum, DC–30kHz, 19+20kHz at 0dBFS into 300 ohms, 44.1kHz data (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

Intermodulation distortion with an equal mix of 19 and 20kHz tones, each at –6dBFS, was also very low (fig.13), with the difference tone at 1kHz lying at –130dB (0.00003%). This graph was taken with the HQ Gauss filter; the HQ Apod. filter behaved identically. The difference product was similarly low with the three ESS filters, but with them, aliased images of the primary tone can be been at –93dB (fig.14). Again, the Wandla wasn't fazed by the 600 ohm load, the intermodulation products remaining at the same ultralow level as they were into 100k ohms.


Fig.15 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, HQ Gauss filter, high-resolution jitter spectrum of analog output signal, 11.025kHz at –6dBFS, sampled at 44.1kHz with LSB toggled at 229Hz: 16-bit TosLink data (left channel blue, right red). Center frequency of trace, 11.025kHz; frequency range, ±3.5kHz.

The Wandla offered excellent rejection of word-clock jitter via all its digital inputs. Fig.15 shows the spectrum of the Wandla's output when it was fed high-level 16-bit J-Test data via TosLink. All the odd-order harmonics of the undithered low-frequency, LSB-level squarewave lie at the correct levels, though the central spike that represents the high-level tone at one-quarter the sample rate (Fs/4) is surrounded by low-level sidebands spaced at the same 35Hz intervals I found in my low-frequency noisefloor analysis.?


Fig.16 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, analog input, frequency response at 1V into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red) and 600 ohms (left green, right gray) (0.25dB vertical div.).

The single-ended analog line input preserved absolute polarity. With the Ferrum's Analog Input Gain set to 0dB and the volume control set to its maximum, the voltage gain at 1kHz measured 5.82dB from the balanced outputs and –0.21dB from the single-ended outputs. The Input Gain can be increased in accurate 1dB steps up to 12dB. The input impedance is specified as 47k ohms; I measured 45k ohms at 20Hz and 1kHz, 39.5k ohms at 20kHz. The analog frequency response (fig.16) was flat from 10Hz to 50kHz and down by –0.9dB at 200kHz. Channel separation was excellent, at >110dB below 3kHz and still 100dB at 20kHz.


Fig.17 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, analog input, spectrum of 1kHz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 2V with volume control set to the maximum (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale)..

With the Wandla's line input shorted to ground and the volume control set to its maximum with 0dB Analog Input Gain, the wideband, unweighted signal/noise ratio (ref. 1V) measured 73dB in both channels at the balanced outputs. Restricting the measurement bandwidth to the audioband increased that ratio to 99.3dB, and an A-weighting filter increased it further, to 102dB. Increasing the Analog Input Gain by 12dB reduced the unweighted ratios by 10dB. The Ferrum's analog input's low-frequency noisefloor (fig.17) was free from the 35Hz-spaced spuriae that I had found with the digital inputs.


Fig.18 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, analog input, THD+N (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 100k ohms.

Fig.18 shows how the THD+noise percentage in the balanced output changed as the output voltage into 100k ohms increased. The downward slope below 5V output is due to actual distortion lying below the noisefloor. The distortion starts to rise above that output level but is still extraordinarily low. The balanced output clipped at a very high 20V into this load; the unbalanced output clipped at half that voltage, as expected. The balanced clipping voltage into the punishing 600 ohms load was 16.5V.


Fig.19 Ferrum Wandla with Hypsos supply, analog input, spectrum of 50Hz sinewave, DC–1kHz, at 2V into 100k ohms (left channel blue, right red; linear frequency scale).

The distortion in both output types was extremely low at all audio frequencies, and the second- and third-harmonics lay at or below a vanishingly low –120dB (0.0001%) into high impedances (fig.19). This was the case with both the HYPSOS and wall-wart supplies.

Even when powered by its wall-wart supply, the Ferrum Wandla performed supremely well on the test bench with both analog and digital inputs, especially with the HQ Gauss reconstruction filter. It boasts very high resolution, very low distortion and noise, and a bombproof output stage.—John Atkinson

COMPANY INFO
HEM/Ferrum
Aleje Jerozolimskie 475
05-800 Pruszków
Poland
sales@vanaltd.com
(631) 246-4412
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Glotz's picture

I wish I had the dosh for this and the power supply. Those filters seem like some next-level engineering. Another listen at AXPONA is in order for sure. Thanks for the review and your succinct conclusion- a great way to spend 1/3 to get $10k sound.

Purité AUDIO's picture

Doesn’t it work without Cardas Clear Beyond Belief cables?
Keith

Glotz's picture

Elvis Costello just approved of the latest iteration. The cables work fine.

kai's picture

I had liked to see measurements published comparing between HYPSOS and the wall-wart supply.
Or maybe just clearly mentioned if there aren’t any differences.

BTW: There’s a little typo in the underline of Fig. 18: “… output power into 8 ohms” should be 100 kOhms.

Anton's picture

"The distortion in both output types was extremely low at all audio frequencies, and the second- and third-harmonics lay at or below a vanishingly low –120dB (0.0001%) into high impedances (fig.19). This was the case with both the HYPSOS and wall-wart supplies.

Even when powered by its wall-wart supply, the Ferrum Wandla performed supremely well on the test bench with both analog and digital inputs, especially with the HQ Gauss reconstruction filter. It boasts very high resolution, very low distortion and noise, and a bombproof output stage."

__

I agree with you, it is very interesting to compare with and without things. On a slight tangent: pre and post "break in measurements" of things, especially speakers, could be very enlightening!

Cheers.

John Atkinson's picture
kai wrote:
I had liked to see measurements published comparing between HYPSOS and the wall-wart supply. Or maybe just clearly mentioned if there aren’t any differences.

The only difference I found and wrote about was that the random noisefloor, which was already low with the HYPSOS supply, was 6dB lower with the wall-wart. All other measurements were identical.

kai wrote:
BTW: There’s a little typo in the underline of Fig.18: “ . . . output power into 8 ohms” should be 100k ohms.

Thanks. I have fixed it.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

georgehifi's picture

"was 6dB lower with the wall-wart. All other measurements were identical"

No need then to blow $1200 for the Hyposos power supply, the wall wart should be better, looking at the measurements.
Any wattage specs on the wall wart??

Cheers George

Ktracho's picture

I'm wondering if you tried using the Wandla as a preamplifier. Can it do double duty, or would you still need a separate preamp to get great sound if your other source is, say, a phono preamp?

John Atkinson's picture
Ktracho wrote:
I'm wondering if you tried using the Wandla as a preamplifier. Can it do double duty, or would you still need a separate preamp to get great sound if your other source is, say, a phono preamp?

The Wandla's measured performance as a line preamplifier is beyond reproach.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

MBMax's picture

I continue to search for that next level with my fairly large CD collection, within my $ comfort zone of course. This Wandla would be stretching it, but I am really intrigued by the filter and voltage flexibilities and their impact on sound.

So... Herb, you auditioned many streaming selections in 16/44.1. Helpful.

For you, and others with streaming experience, what have you found with streaming versus CD's in general? IOW, can I generally extrapolate Herb's 16/44.1 streaming experience to what my CD experience might be?

Currently, depending on the disc, I switch between my old Marantz SA-8004 on board DAC and my MHDT Orchid R2R DAC. Both are quite nice. Both leave me feeling there's more to be had from my CD's. Friends, please tell me to knock it off if I'm just falling victim to audiophilia nervosa...

Meanwhile... thoughts on getting the most out of my CD's welcomed.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Speaking personally, I play files and stream music in all resolutions rather than play silver discs. It's easier, consumes far less space, and sounds great. As to which sounds better in 16/44.1, file playback / streaming the same files from Qobuz or Tidal / playing the discs, it depends on the quality of your playback software and hardware. On my system, the order of sound quality, with the best on top, is:

Files stored on my Innuos Statement Next-Gen's internal SSD
Files streamed from Tidal and Qobuz
Files sourced by my NAS which is powered by a Ferrum Hypsos hybrid power supply.

Note that my streaming network is highly optimized with an optical interface and top-quality ethernet, USB, and power cables. It has taken a lot of time and money to get where I'm at.

Short answer: There is no absolute "this sounds better than that." You need to experiment and listen.

I hope this is helpful.

jason

MBMax's picture

But in a more immediate sense, what I am really after is how to optimize what I currently have, i.e. a few thousand CDs (along with probably 3K LP's, and a hundred or so reel to reel tapes).

I have heard enough goodness out of the variety of affordable DAC's and players I've owned that I can tell there is more to be had. The greatest change (mostly, but not always, for the better) I've experienced has come from the R2R ladder DAC rabbit hole. More analog sound though at times with the loss of some detail and vitality.

So, because of the significant differences experienced, I suspect I can do still BETTER, but my budget is not 5 figures deep for DACs, dedicated transports, separate power supplies, etc.

I guess my real question is this then: based on the experiences of my fellow music lovers reading this, what have you found (IF anything) that generally takes CDs to the next level? And, by the way, my food chain upper end in toto for DACs, USB cables, S/PDIF cables, power cables, etc. runs to maybe $5K for the sake of my marriage, budget, and conscience.

I have been tempted to jump into the Benchmark pool, the Bryston pool, and some other pools, but hesitate because, though auditions and 30 day trials abound, I have found that I really have to LIVE with a piece of gear for the long haul to truly know...

You pays your money, you takes your chances. For that reason, and that fact that most DAC reviews don't spend much time on CD reproduction specifically, I reach out.

No expectations, just sharing. Thanks for the feedback thus far...

Mark in Santa Cruz

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

I'd check out Herb's reviews of lower priced DACs. Also consider that the very first power cable in your chain has ramifications totally down the line.

Easiest solution. Many of your CDs are undoubtedly streamable, and some of those streams will be hi-rez. Put Qobuz, Tidal, or Roon on your computer, get a better cable interface, and connect to a streaming DAC.

Here's to long-lived relationships, with music helping to magnify the joy.

jason

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Some of my colleagues swear by its sound. And it costs far less than Roon.

MBMax's picture

And this brings me alllll the way back to what motivated me to write in the first place: this DAC under review by Herb is quite intriguing specifically because of the fact that the user has a lot of options to shape the sound.

Maybe I should just take the leap... (insert shrug and forehead smack emojis here).

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

See my assessment of the Ferrum front end at the Warsaw show. I was surprised by how good it sounded. You can always go with just the DAC and then spring for the Hypsos later on. If you don't hear the difference immediately, perhaps you can return. I'd check with them.

MBMax's picture

Taking a flyer on a Wadla with the ridiculously gracious encouragement of my wife along with Herb and Jason.

We shall see... er hear. Looking for endgame DAC for CD's. Perhaps?

And thanks for the tip on Audirvana. Will check it out!

Glotz's picture

Will charge you for the restock fee the last time I checked when I bought my HPA4 and when I returned cables that I didn't need. Important note to factor in when buying from them. You should be quite happy with their products, though I realize you would be looking at DAC3 family.

MBMax's picture

Thanks Glotz.

Hopefully the Wandla is a winner in my system and a return or resale is unnecessary.

Was leaning toward trying a DAC3 but... the flexibility of the Ferrum as extolled by Herb tipped me that way.

Also, research quickly revealed that an in-shop audition of this kit is nigh impossible anywhere near me. So I'm jumping in!

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Now I wait in suspense to learn if it gives you what you want, or if the entire experience leads you to question the feedback and opinions of HR and JVS. Once your new baby settles in, please send an email and let me / us know. If you can't find our addresses, write us c/o stletters@stereophile.com.

Thank you,
jason

MBMax's picture

You're a good cheerleader JVS.

Over the many years, I've never been misled by wise ol' Herb or the late, great Art D. As for you JVS, I've never really had the chance to test your audio judgment and wisdom, mainly because I'm in a much lower audiophile price orbit. But your feedback here was a good nudge.

Will report back when the new unit is broken in and making music. I'm looking forward to some fresh deep dives into my Mercury Living Presence boxes in particular, followed by a lot of Bill Evans, Joe Henderson, Lee Morgan, and many more.

This is a great hobby and dare I say family, conflicts, warts, and all.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Do check out Tom Fine's latest remasterings of the MLP catalogue.

MBMax's picture

if my first set of notes got to their intended recipients or if said recipients care, but either way, here's a retry

Since I wrote the below, my listening has gotten much more extensive of course, and I'm pretty excited by what I'm hearing. So early impressions below, more to come.

Oh heck, preview of the more to come: clarity and vitality I have been wanting, soundstage GALORE, high end extension, musicality. One latent concern...

I'll keep any readers, or the ether, in suspense on that.

From a couple weeks ago:

Life With Wandla, Part 1 (per JVS invitation)

I have a new crush and her name is Wandla.

My wife's OK with it, she's a Polish DAC. Wandla that is, not my wife.

My impressions thus far (early, early in the relationship) include the following:

1) Holy Kumquats! High end extension and detail in spades compared to my back-burnered MHDT Orchid and Marantz on-board DACs. Or is it digital etch and glare that shines at first then quickly grows wearisome?

TBD. Much break-in and filter experimentation ahead.

2) First listens to a couple of MLP monos from big CD box #1 were not promising. Kubelik's CSO string section bailed out in favor of several dozen sharp-clawed cats with tiny little chalkboards.

However, several hours break-in later, Joe Henderson and buddies (from the great Mosaic box set) provided a sweet and open top-end. Hoping that Kubelik's strings will return. Sooner than later.

3) SOUNDSTAGE. Silly deep and wide (even outside the the width of my Falcon LS3/5a's) Never have I heard such breadth, depth, and layering from CD's. Switching back to the Marantz, everything collapses overbaked souffle like.

This could get interesting. It's already fun.

Mark in Santa Cruz out.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

I'm very happy for you. May the fun increase.

jason

PS. When I have a product that requires break-in, I try not to listen at all until break-in is complete. First impressions are often not lasting impressions. Nonetheless, sometimes I can't restrain myself.

MBMax's picture

though I do enjoy hearing a component evolve over the first dozens / hundreds of hours. It's a rather fascinating process to hear changes over this time from a static piece of electronic kit. Still a bit of a mind bender to me.

So, I tend to play a lot of music in the house with a new component only settling in to listen closely periodically to "check in." Ferr instance, listened to an old gem last night, Al Jarreau's "Tenderness." Oh. My. Goodness. Once again, space, room, expansiveness galore, even in my small listening space. Bending the laws of physics, one disc at a time...

Planning to get back to the old, offending (and early) MLPs today or tomorrow to hear whether the cats are still around or the string players have returned. Perhaps it's just the recording and my MHDT DAC higher frequency softness tamed the harshness. TBD.

Thanks for listening, er, reading.

MBMax's picture

OK, I give in. The Ferrum Wandla is all the reviews make it out to be and more.

I've never heard CD's with so much body and soul, and warmth without sacrificing detail and vitality.

And, as I have mentioned, sound staging galore, including height like never before in my system with digital.

So glad I took the leap, and this without even going to the Hypsos PSU.

Yet.

And to add to the fun, this piece of kit comes from near the epicenter of my heritage - northern Slovakia / southern Poland.

Well played Wandla for the great work and stupid high value, Herb for capturing and communicating the essence of this piece, and JVS for the nudge (or shall I say benevolent shove :) to dive in.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

May the Wandla give you years of joy.

jason

georgehifi's picture

Your Orchid dac is similar to the Pagoda save that uses the TDA1541 chip while the Pagoda uses the PCM1704 chip (which I think is the better) but the way both are implemented leaves a lot to think about, as the distortion figures are through the roof at nearly 1.5%!!!!! and below 80dB dynamic range. I would look to a new dac that is at least <.005% to get more enjoyment from your CD collection.

Cheers George

ok's picture

streaming = casual
vinyl = natural
cd = intense

georgehifi's picture

streaming = casual
vinyl = natural
cd = intensely natural, if done well.

Cheers George

Jim Austin's picture

Thanks to everyone who has participated.

Jim Austin, Editor
Stereophile

MBMax's picture

Oops... posted here instead of as a reply by mistake

X