Ferrum Wandla D/A preamplifier Page 2

Next, I used Cardas's all-natural Clear Beyond interconnects and speaker cables to connect the Wandla directly to the RCA inputs of the Parasound Halo A 21+ amplifier driving the Heretic AD614 speakers. This is my highest-resolving, most uncompressed amp-speaker combo, and it gave me the feeling I was experiencing the "real" Wandla, which now sounded clear and solid and considerably more color-saturated than it had with the wire-wart supply. In my notes, I wrote "Studio sound with flair!"

The next thing I noticed with the 300W A 21+ powering the 97dB/2.83V/m–sensitive Heretics was deeper, denser bass from the left side of Samson François's keyboard. The effect of this weightier bass was to put all 88 piano keys into a smoother octave-to-octave balance. With the HYPSOS powering the Wandla, voices and instruments displayed a more complete and natural spectral balance.

What stood out with this simple, Ferrum-sourced sound system was how its reportage seemed so straightforward and unadorned. No flavorizing. No luminous wowie-zowie. But just enough glow and punch and focused resolve to be satisfying with all musical genres.

Like Ferrum's OOR headphone amp, the Wandla wears its solid stateness proudly, as a virtue, not something to be suppressed. Respecting that and remembering how much I enjoyed the OOR, I decided to let myself fall into some long listening and enjoy the Ferrum's sound on its own terms. No sooner did I make that decision than I began falling under the Wandla's spell. The more recordings I played, the more the Wandla seemed to come to life.

The older I get, the more I see how audio equipment is like cars: You can't let components sit around getting flat tires. You have to start them up, heat up their oil, and take them for long, high-revving spins. I left the Wandla on 24/7 for the entire month. Every day, it got looser, more athletic, and more right-brain enticing. By the third week, it was Swan Lake enabled. So...

For fun I started my swan-clad ballerina journey with Madness's version of Tchaikovsky's Swan Lake, from the album One Step Beyond (16/44.1 FLAC, Rhino–Warner/Qobuz). There were no "baby ballerinas" from the Ballet Russes—just bass-fueled, speeding rhythms and that "heavy heavy monster sound" of mad Brits pogoing between the Heretics. Exactly what I was hoping for.

Filters and voltages
I followed that with a version of Swan Lake I've been wanting to enjoy but have not yet connected with: Tchaikovsky: Ballet Suites with Mstislav Rostropovich conducting the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra playing Swan Lake Suite, Op.20a, recorded in 1996 (24/96 FLAC, Deutsche Grammophon/Qobuz). With the Wandla at its default settings (HD, HQ Apodizing filter, 24V DC), it sounded dry and compressed on loud passages—as it usually does. Then I remembered an email from Ferrum importer Roy Feldstein of Vana Ltd.: "Have you tried adjusting the voltage in the HYPSOS to match HQ filters? I'd suggest auditioning the HQ Apodizing filter at 22 to 23 volts. The HQ Gaussian filter works better at 26 volts in my system."

The Wandla arrived with its default HQ Apodizing filter engaged and the HYPSOS outputting 24V DC automatically. So, what the hay? I lowered the HYPSOS to 22 volts and tried that Rostropovich-Tchaikovsky again. Deutsche Grammophon's loud-passage compression was still there, but the overall sound had thinned a bit; there was more space and atmosphere in the quiet passages. At 22V DC, the Ballet Suites sounded just sweet and open enough to keep my mind focused on Rostropovich conducting the Berlin. This was the first time I listened to this album all the way through.

This 2V reduction in the Wandla's rail voltage made albums with two-star sonics sound like they had three-star sonics, which encouraged me to experiment more.

After playing the HQ Apodizing filter at 22V DC, I tried HQ's Gaussian filter at 22V DC (just to see what it would do), whereupon I noticed an increase in vibrancy but also a dullness. At 24V, the sound got brighter (lighting-wise) and more microdynamic. Rostropovich's Swan Lake became bright, tight, and tidy, in an appealing way.

When I upped the voltage to 26V like Roy suggested, the change was more obvious. Swan Lake sounded a half-star better. Vocals became dreamy on João Gilberto (1973) (16/44.1 FLAC, Ipanema/Tidal), and that's how I like João to sound. Right away I thought I like this, but I knew I needed to listen to more records longer and closer.

You see, it doesn't matter which filter or voltage settings I like; what's important for readers to realize is that Tchaikovsky's Ballet Suites, which I found to be a two-star recording at 24V apodizing and a three-star recording at 22V apodizing, became a 3.5-star recording at 26V Gaussian. With the Wandla/HYPSOS/Envy driving my Koss ESP 950 electrostatic headphones, it seemed like a five-star recording.

I asked Max Matuszak, Wandla's hardware engineer/designer, why his DAC needed "filter choices." I decided his answer deserved to be shared. "Filter choices are necessary because they change the final sound signature. There are many tradeoffs in digital interpolation-filter design, which have impact on aliasing rejection or pre- and post-ringing of impulse response. Digital filters are designed to focus on one of those characteristics or to balance between them. Therefore, filter selection allows tuning of the Wandla's final sound signature, depending on personal taste. We have some white papers on those topics, which explain this in detail (footnote 3).

"Right now, we use two HQ filters in Wandla. They are versions of filters from HQPlayer app designed and adapted by Jussi Laako of Signalyst for our SERCE module (which processes filtering). Those filters have much better attenuation in the stopband than ESS filters, so they reject aliasing much better."

I asked Max which of the filters he believed best represented the Ferrum sound aesthetic.

"HQ Apod. is our default filter, so it can be considered as the Ferrum sound aesthetic. Trying different supply voltages from HYPSOS will definitely introduce noticeable changes, but I would consider all of them as part of the family of Ferrum's sound aesthetic."

And what about recommended voltages? "When switching from the wall-wart supply, I suggest starting with 24V on the HYPSOS output, because it is the voltage on the output of the wall-wart supply, so it will be a fair comparison. After this, I suggest tinkering with voltage on the HYPSOS output. You should definitely try Roy's suggestions of supply voltage to specific filter, but I encourage you to experiment further after you try those suggestions. Maybe different values will fit your system and taste better. That's why this function of voltage adjustment in HYPSOS is called SST (Sweet Spot Tuning)."

Listening through the Genelec G Three
The analog output of every digital converter must push through all the wires, amps, and speakers strung in front of it. That's not an easy task, and some converters are better equipped to handle it than others. The best someone like me can do is give a DAC a clean, unfettered path.

With hopes of doing that, I connected the balanced analog output of the Wandla to the balanced input of the Genelec G Three active speakers using AudioQuest's ThunderBird interconnects, which I chose because in my view they put through the most low-level signal, especially at the frequency extremes. In my ever-changing sound systems, these interconnects have a history of making R-2R DACs sound bright and superdynamic—qualities they don't normally exhibit. I use ThunderBird wires with the Denafrips Terminator Plus because the T-Birds make the Terminator sound turbocharged. That is exactly what they did for the Wandla.

One thing this interconnect-induced turbocharging accomplished was to make the Ferrum-AudioQuest-Genelec system whisper for goosebumps. Music at low volumes sparkled and scintillated. Playing João Gilberto (1973), the Wandla seduced with detail and captivated with its transparency. João's famously rich vocal textures were seductively highlighted at low volumes. I auditioned the Wandla with a variety of amp-floorspeaker combos, but this Genelec G Three pairing showed the Wandla's sound at its most transparent and dynamic. I earnestly recommend this Wandla–G Three combo as a possible end-game sound system for audiophiles that value measurements and sweet sound.

In concert, the $1486/pair G Threes, the $2795 Wandla, and the $1195 HYPSOS power supply were the heart of one of the more articulate and seductive sound systems I've assembled in my studio.

Conclusion
The Wandla-HYPSOS combo is a thoroughly, wisely engineered converter that made me look forward to using it and made me smile every time I did. At its best with the HYPSOS, the Wandla danced in the same ballroom as DACs costing over $10,000. Sincerely recommended.


Footnote 3: See ferrum.audio/digital-filters-in-general, ferrum.audio/wandla-ddf-dynamic-digital-filters, and ferrum.audio/wandla-ddf-dynamic-digital-filtering.

COMPANY INFO
HEM/Ferrum
Aleje Jerozolimskie 475
05-800 Pruszków
Poland
sales@vanaltd.com
(631) 246-4412
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
Glotz's picture

I wish I had the dosh for this and the power supply. Those filters seem like some next-level engineering. Another listen at AXPONA is in order for sure. Thanks for the review and your succinct conclusion- a great way to spend 1/3 to get $10k sound.

Purité AUDIO's picture

Doesn’t it work without Cardas Clear Beyond Belief cables?
Keith

Glotz's picture

Elvis Costello just approved of the latest iteration. The cables work fine.

kai's picture

I had liked to see measurements published comparing between HYPSOS and the wall-wart supply.
Or maybe just clearly mentioned if there aren’t any differences.

BTW: There’s a little typo in the underline of Fig. 18: “… output power into 8 ohms” should be 100 kOhms.

Anton's picture

"The distortion in both output types was extremely low at all audio frequencies, and the second- and third-harmonics lay at or below a vanishingly low –120dB (0.0001%) into high impedances (fig.19). This was the case with both the HYPSOS and wall-wart supplies.

Even when powered by its wall-wart supply, the Ferrum Wandla performed supremely well on the test bench with both analog and digital inputs, especially with the HQ Gauss reconstruction filter. It boasts very high resolution, very low distortion and noise, and a bombproof output stage."

__

I agree with you, it is very interesting to compare with and without things. On a slight tangent: pre and post "break in measurements" of things, especially speakers, could be very enlightening!

Cheers.

John Atkinson's picture
kai wrote:
I had liked to see measurements published comparing between HYPSOS and the wall-wart supply. Or maybe just clearly mentioned if there aren’t any differences.

The only difference I found and wrote about was that the random noisefloor, which was already low with the HYPSOS supply, was 6dB lower with the wall-wart. All other measurements were identical.

kai wrote:
BTW: There’s a little typo in the underline of Fig.18: “ . . . output power into 8 ohms” should be 100k ohms.

Thanks. I have fixed it.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

georgehifi's picture

"was 6dB lower with the wall-wart. All other measurements were identical"

No need then to blow $1200 for the Hyposos power supply, the wall wart should be better, looking at the measurements.
Any wattage specs on the wall wart??

Cheers George

Ktracho's picture

I'm wondering if you tried using the Wandla as a preamplifier. Can it do double duty, or would you still need a separate preamp to get great sound if your other source is, say, a phono preamp?

John Atkinson's picture
Ktracho wrote:
I'm wondering if you tried using the Wandla as a preamplifier. Can it do double duty, or would you still need a separate preamp to get great sound if your other source is, say, a phono preamp?

The Wandla's measured performance as a line preamplifier is beyond reproach.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

MBMax's picture

I continue to search for that next level with my fairly large CD collection, within my $ comfort zone of course. This Wandla would be stretching it, but I am really intrigued by the filter and voltage flexibilities and their impact on sound.

So... Herb, you auditioned many streaming selections in 16/44.1. Helpful.

For you, and others with streaming experience, what have you found with streaming versus CD's in general? IOW, can I generally extrapolate Herb's 16/44.1 streaming experience to what my CD experience might be?

Currently, depending on the disc, I switch between my old Marantz SA-8004 on board DAC and my MHDT Orchid R2R DAC. Both are quite nice. Both leave me feeling there's more to be had from my CD's. Friends, please tell me to knock it off if I'm just falling victim to audiophilia nervosa...

Meanwhile... thoughts on getting the most out of my CD's welcomed.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Speaking personally, I play files and stream music in all resolutions rather than play silver discs. It's easier, consumes far less space, and sounds great. As to which sounds better in 16/44.1, file playback / streaming the same files from Qobuz or Tidal / playing the discs, it depends on the quality of your playback software and hardware. On my system, the order of sound quality, with the best on top, is:

Files stored on my Innuos Statement Next-Gen's internal SSD
Files streamed from Tidal and Qobuz
Files sourced by my NAS which is powered by a Ferrum Hypsos hybrid power supply.

Note that my streaming network is highly optimized with an optical interface and top-quality ethernet, USB, and power cables. It has taken a lot of time and money to get where I'm at.

Short answer: There is no absolute "this sounds better than that." You need to experiment and listen.

I hope this is helpful.

jason

MBMax's picture

But in a more immediate sense, what I am really after is how to optimize what I currently have, i.e. a few thousand CDs (along with probably 3K LP's, and a hundred or so reel to reel tapes).

I have heard enough goodness out of the variety of affordable DAC's and players I've owned that I can tell there is more to be had. The greatest change (mostly, but not always, for the better) I've experienced has come from the R2R ladder DAC rabbit hole. More analog sound though at times with the loss of some detail and vitality.

So, because of the significant differences experienced, I suspect I can do still BETTER, but my budget is not 5 figures deep for DACs, dedicated transports, separate power supplies, etc.

I guess my real question is this then: based on the experiences of my fellow music lovers reading this, what have you found (IF anything) that generally takes CDs to the next level? And, by the way, my food chain upper end in toto for DACs, USB cables, S/PDIF cables, power cables, etc. runs to maybe $5K for the sake of my marriage, budget, and conscience.

I have been tempted to jump into the Benchmark pool, the Bryston pool, and some other pools, but hesitate because, though auditions and 30 day trials abound, I have found that I really have to LIVE with a piece of gear for the long haul to truly know...

You pays your money, you takes your chances. For that reason, and that fact that most DAC reviews don't spend much time on CD reproduction specifically, I reach out.

No expectations, just sharing. Thanks for the feedback thus far...

Mark in Santa Cruz

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

I'd check out Herb's reviews of lower priced DACs. Also consider that the very first power cable in your chain has ramifications totally down the line.

Easiest solution. Many of your CDs are undoubtedly streamable, and some of those streams will be hi-rez. Put Qobuz, Tidal, or Roon on your computer, get a better cable interface, and connect to a streaming DAC.

Here's to long-lived relationships, with music helping to magnify the joy.

jason

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Some of my colleagues swear by its sound. And it costs far less than Roon.

MBMax's picture

And this brings me alllll the way back to what motivated me to write in the first place: this DAC under review by Herb is quite intriguing specifically because of the fact that the user has a lot of options to shape the sound.

Maybe I should just take the leap... (insert shrug and forehead smack emojis here).

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

See my assessment of the Ferrum front end at the Warsaw show. I was surprised by how good it sounded. You can always go with just the DAC and then spring for the Hypsos later on. If you don't hear the difference immediately, perhaps you can return. I'd check with them.

MBMax's picture

Taking a flyer on a Wadla with the ridiculously gracious encouragement of my wife along with Herb and Jason.

We shall see... er hear. Looking for endgame DAC for CD's. Perhaps?

And thanks for the tip on Audirvana. Will check it out!

Glotz's picture

Will charge you for the restock fee the last time I checked when I bought my HPA4 and when I returned cables that I didn't need. Important note to factor in when buying from them. You should be quite happy with their products, though I realize you would be looking at DAC3 family.

MBMax's picture

Thanks Glotz.

Hopefully the Wandla is a winner in my system and a return or resale is unnecessary.

Was leaning toward trying a DAC3 but... the flexibility of the Ferrum as extolled by Herb tipped me that way.

Also, research quickly revealed that an in-shop audition of this kit is nigh impossible anywhere near me. So I'm jumping in!

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Now I wait in suspense to learn if it gives you what you want, or if the entire experience leads you to question the feedback and opinions of HR and JVS. Once your new baby settles in, please send an email and let me / us know. If you can't find our addresses, write us c/o stletters@stereophile.com.

Thank you,
jason

MBMax's picture

You're a good cheerleader JVS.

Over the many years, I've never been misled by wise ol' Herb or the late, great Art D. As for you JVS, I've never really had the chance to test your audio judgment and wisdom, mainly because I'm in a much lower audiophile price orbit. But your feedback here was a good nudge.

Will report back when the new unit is broken in and making music. I'm looking forward to some fresh deep dives into my Mercury Living Presence boxes in particular, followed by a lot of Bill Evans, Joe Henderson, Lee Morgan, and many more.

This is a great hobby and dare I say family, conflicts, warts, and all.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

Do check out Tom Fine's latest remasterings of the MLP catalogue.

MBMax's picture

if my first set of notes got to their intended recipients or if said recipients care, but either way, here's a retry

Since I wrote the below, my listening has gotten much more extensive of course, and I'm pretty excited by what I'm hearing. So early impressions below, more to come.

Oh heck, preview of the more to come: clarity and vitality I have been wanting, soundstage GALORE, high end extension, musicality. One latent concern...

I'll keep any readers, or the ether, in suspense on that.

From a couple weeks ago:

Life With Wandla, Part 1 (per JVS invitation)

I have a new crush and her name is Wandla.

My wife's OK with it, she's a Polish DAC. Wandla that is, not my wife.

My impressions thus far (early, early in the relationship) include the following:

1) Holy Kumquats! High end extension and detail in spades compared to my back-burnered MHDT Orchid and Marantz on-board DACs. Or is it digital etch and glare that shines at first then quickly grows wearisome?

TBD. Much break-in and filter experimentation ahead.

2) First listens to a couple of MLP monos from big CD box #1 were not promising. Kubelik's CSO string section bailed out in favor of several dozen sharp-clawed cats with tiny little chalkboards.

However, several hours break-in later, Joe Henderson and buddies (from the great Mosaic box set) provided a sweet and open top-end. Hoping that Kubelik's strings will return. Sooner than later.

3) SOUNDSTAGE. Silly deep and wide (even outside the the width of my Falcon LS3/5a's) Never have I heard such breadth, depth, and layering from CD's. Switching back to the Marantz, everything collapses overbaked souffle like.

This could get interesting. It's already fun.

Mark in Santa Cruz out.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

I'm very happy for you. May the fun increase.

jason

PS. When I have a product that requires break-in, I try not to listen at all until break-in is complete. First impressions are often not lasting impressions. Nonetheless, sometimes I can't restrain myself.

MBMax's picture

though I do enjoy hearing a component evolve over the first dozens / hundreds of hours. It's a rather fascinating process to hear changes over this time from a static piece of electronic kit. Still a bit of a mind bender to me.

So, I tend to play a lot of music in the house with a new component only settling in to listen closely periodically to "check in." Ferr instance, listened to an old gem last night, Al Jarreau's "Tenderness." Oh. My. Goodness. Once again, space, room, expansiveness galore, even in my small listening space. Bending the laws of physics, one disc at a time...

Planning to get back to the old, offending (and early) MLPs today or tomorrow to hear whether the cats are still around or the string players have returned. Perhaps it's just the recording and my MHDT DAC higher frequency softness tamed the harshness. TBD.

Thanks for listening, er, reading.

MBMax's picture

OK, I give in. The Ferrum Wandla is all the reviews make it out to be and more.

I've never heard CD's with so much body and soul, and warmth without sacrificing detail and vitality.

And, as I have mentioned, sound staging galore, including height like never before in my system with digital.

So glad I took the leap, and this without even going to the Hypsos PSU.

Yet.

And to add to the fun, this piece of kit comes from near the epicenter of my heritage - northern Slovakia / southern Poland.

Well played Wandla for the great work and stupid high value, Herb for capturing and communicating the essence of this piece, and JVS for the nudge (or shall I say benevolent shove :) to dive in.

Jason Victor Serinus's picture

May the Wandla give you years of joy.

jason

georgehifi's picture

Your Orchid dac is similar to the Pagoda save that uses the TDA1541 chip while the Pagoda uses the PCM1704 chip (which I think is the better) but the way both are implemented leaves a lot to think about, as the distortion figures are through the roof at nearly 1.5%!!!!! and below 80dB dynamic range. I would look to a new dac that is at least <.005% to get more enjoyment from your CD collection.

Cheers George

ok's picture

streaming = casual
vinyl = natural
cd = intense

georgehifi's picture

streaming = casual
vinyl = natural
cd = intensely natural, if done well.

Cheers George

Jim Austin's picture

Thanks to everyone who has participated.

Jim Austin, Editor
Stereophile

MBMax's picture

Oops... posted here instead of as a reply by mistake

X