|
Recent Additions
Budget Components Audacious Audio
Loudspeakers
Amplification
Digital Sources
Analog Sources
Accessories Listening / Art Dudley The Fifth Element / John Marks Music in the Round / Kal Rubinson Fine Tunes / Jonathan Scull Special Features Reference Interviews Think Pieces Historical Recording of the Month Records 2 Die 4 Music/Recordings Stephen Mejias Robert Baird Fred Kaplan Wes Phillips Audio News Past eNewsletters FSI 2008 CES 2008 RMAF 2007 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 FSI 2007 CES 2007 China 2006 RMAF 2006 HFN 2006 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 FSI 2006 CES 2006 Forums Galleries Vote Previous Votes Dealer Locator AV Links Audiophile Societies Contact Us Customer Service New Subscription Digital Subscription Renew Give a Gift Sub Services Recordings Backissues More . . . Phono Preamp Hi-Fi Phono Cartridge Amplifiers Stereo Speakers |
FTC: No More Minimum Advertised Pricing on CDs
MAP, in the FTC's view, is a form of price-fixing. The Big Five agreed to end the policy without admitting any wrongdoing, according to FTC chairman Robert Pitofsky. Spokespeople for at least two of the conglomerates continued to defend the policy while announcing its discontinuance. "We believe MAP serves a valid business purpose for our customers and the consumer and is an appropriate and lawful practice," said a Time Warner executive. A BMG spokesman echoed the sentiment: "While we continue to believe that MAP was a legitimate and appropriate practice, BMG looks forward to moving ahead and continuing to do what we do best: deliver great music to the consumer." Pitofsky estimated that music lovers had overspent by as much as $480 million during the years MAP was in place, and emphasized his hopes that the decision will help "restore much-needed competition" to the music business. "Today's news should be sweet music to the ears of all CD purchasers," he stated. The FTC had been investigating the music industry's price-fixing policy for two years. Antitrust investigators in his agency will be looking into minimum advertised pricing policies in other industries as well, Pitofsky noted. Schemes that "effectively eliminate the ability of dealers to sell at a discount" will be closely examined, he said. MAP has been standard practice in certain sectors of the consumer-electronics market for many years, despite the fact that the law prohibits manufacturers from dictating to retailers how products can be priced on their sales floors. Whether this will change in response to the FTC's action is unknown. The music industry's anti-discounting policy was loose enough to allow some discounting, especially by smaller specialty stores not eligible to participate in co-op advertising. Sony Music, Time Warner, and BMG Entertainment continue to work both sides of the street by undercutting dealers through the Columbia House and BMG music clubs, which sometimes offer new and old releases discounted by as much as 80% off the suggested retail. An immediate widescale reduction in CD prices in stores is unlikely, some retailers stated, but new releases by popular artists should debut in stores at lower-than-suggested prices as a way of pulling customers in. Under terms of the agreement, no new MAP policy may be written for the next seven years, and for the following 13 years the record companies may not tie promotional funds to advertised prices, or allow pricing considerations to affect their relationships with retailers. Dealers, in other words, are now free to set prices as they see fit. Several observers noted that the music industry capitulated rather easily this time around with the FTC, possibly due to the fact that Time Warner's proposed merger with America Online must meet FTC approval, as must Warner Music's takeover of EMI. The music industry is estimated at $15 billion annually, of which the Big Five control approximately 85%. All have plans for making their products available online and bypassing traditional retailers completely.
|
|

